The Facebook, Inc. v. Connectu, Inc et al

Filing 440

Declaration of EVAN A. PARKE in Support of 439 MOTION to Seal Document 438 MOTION for Leave to File Sur-Reply filed byConnectU LLC. (Related document(s) 439 ) (Holtzman, Steven) (Filed on 6/19/2008)

Download PDF
The Facebook, Inc. v. Connectu, LLC et al Doc. 440 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STEVEN C. HOLTZMAN (CA BAR NO. 144177) sholtzman@bsfllp.com BOIES SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP 1999 Harrison Street, Suite 900 Oakland, CA 94612 Telephone: (510) 874-1000 Facsimile: (510) 874-1460 D. MICHAEL UNDERHILL (pro hac vice) munderhill@bsfllp.com BOIES SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP 5301 Wisconsin Avenue NW Washington, D.C. 20015 Telephone: (202) 237-2727 Facsimile: (202) 237-6131 Attorneys for Defendant CONNECTU, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION THE FACEBOOK, INC. and MARK ZUCKERBERG, Plaintiffs, v. CONNECTU, INC. (formerly known as CONNECTU, LLC), PACIFIC NORTHWEST SOFTWARE, INC., WINSTON WILLIAMS, and WAYNE CHANG, Defendants. DECLARATION OF EVAN A. PARKE IN SUPPORT OF CONNECTU, INC.'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL CONNECTU, INC.'S ADMINISTRATIVE REQUEST FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SUR-REPLY. PARKE DECL., MOTION TO SEAL 5:07-CV-01389-JW Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 I, Evan A. Parke, declare as follows: 1. I am an associate with the law firm of Boies, Schiller & Flexner LLP, counsel to ConnectU, Inc. I am licensed to practice law in the District of Columbia and in the State of Illinois and am appearing in this case per an order of the Court granting my application to appear pro hac vice. I have personal knowledge of the facts and circumstances set forth in this Declaration. I make this Declaration pursuant to Civil L.R. 7-11 and 79-5(b). 2. Good cause exists for sealing ConnectU, Inc.'s Administrative Request to File a Sur-reply (including the Sur-reply in Opposition to Confidential Motion and Declarations of Cameron Winklevoss, Donna M. Hitscherich, and Scott R. Mosko attached thereto). Plaintiffs have taken the position that their Confidential Motion and all papers filed in support thereof contain confidential information that is subject to the protection in the Stipulated Protective Order dated January 23, 2006. The materials requested to be sealed in this motion contain the same or related information that Plaintiffs contend is covered by that Protective Order and/or are alleged by Plaintiff to implicate confidentiality provisions found in a purported agreement that is the subject of dispute between the parties. 3. 3 1 This Administrative Motion is being made pursuant to Civil L.R. 79-5, which requires a Court order to seal documents and does not permit sealing by stipulation. /// /// /// /// By filing this declaration, ConnectU does not waive any arguments or rights as to (i) the admissibility or inadmissibility of evidence surrounding the purported agreement, (ii) the confidentiality or nonconfidentiality of information relating to the purported agreement, or (iii) the enforceability or unenforceability of the purported agreement. 1 1 PARKE DECL., MOTION TO SEAL 5:07-CV-01389-JW 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. Executed this 19th day of June, 2008. /s/ Evan A. Parke Evan A. Parke 2 PARKE DECL., MOTION TO SEAL 5:07-CV-01389-JW 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: June 19, 2008 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that this document(s) filed through the ECF system will be sent electronically to the registered participants as identified on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) and paper copies will be sent to those indicated as non registered participants on June 19, 2008. /s/ Steven C. Holtzman Steven C. Holtzman 3 PARKE DECL., MOTION TO SEAL 5:07-CV-01389-JW

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?