The Facebook, Inc. v. Connectu, Inc et al

Filing 597

Proposed Order denying re 574 MOTION to intervene by Mark Zuckerberg, The Facebook, Inc.. (Chatterjee, I.) (Filed on 8/4/2008) Modified on 8/5/2008 (cv, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
The Facebook, Inc. v. Connectu, LLC et al Doc. 59 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SEAN A. LINCOLN (STATE BAR NO. 136387) salinco ln@orrick.com I. NEEL CHATTERJEE (STATE BAR NO. 173985) nchatterjee@orrick.com MONTE COOPER (STATE BAR NO. 196746) mcooper@orrick.co m THERESA A. SUTTON (STATE BAR NO. 211857) tsutton@orrick.com YVONNE P. GREER (State Bar No. 214072) ygreer@orrick.co m ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP 1000 Marsh Road Menlo Park, CA 94025 Telephone: +1-650-614-7400 Facsimile: +1-650-614-7401 Attorneys for Plaintiffs THE FACEBOOK, INC. and MARK ZUCKERBERG UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION THE FACEBOOK, INC. and MARK ZUCKERBERG, Plaint iffs, v. CONNECTU, INC. (formerly known as CONNECTU, LLC) PACIFIC NORTHWEST SOFTWARE, INC. WINSTON WILLIAMS, and WAYNE CHANG, Defendants. Case No. 5:07-CV-01389-JW [PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING MOTION TO INTERVENE BY CAMERON WINKLEVOSS, TYLER WINKLEVOSS, AND DIVYA NARENDRA Date: Time: Courtroom: Judge: August 6, 2008 4:30 p.m. 8 Honorable James Ware [PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING MOTION TO INTERVENE 5:07-CV-01389-JW Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 The matter before the Court is the Motion to Intervene by Cameron Winklevoss, Tyler Winklevoss, and Divya Narendra. The Court has considered said motion and all papers in support and opposition thereto and, finding good cause, hereby DENIES ConnectU Founders' Motion to Intervene. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: _________ ___, 2008 Honorable James Ware United States District Judge Northern District of California -1- [PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING MOTION TO INTERVENE 5:07-CV-01389-JW

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?