The Facebook, Inc. v. Connectu, Inc et al
USCA Case Number 09-15133 9th Circuit Court of Appeals (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/22/2009)
The Facebook, Inc. v. Connectu, LLC et al
M o lly C . D w y e r C l e r k of C o u r t
O f fic e of the Clerk U n ited States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 9 5 Seventh Street P o st Office Box 193939 S an Francisco, California 94119-3939 Jan u ary 22, 2009 C A 9 Docket No.: A g en cy Numbers: S h o rt Title: 0 9 - 1 5 1 3 3 ; 09-15021 Cross Appeal 5:07-cv -0 1 3 8 9 - J W , 5:07-cv-01389-JW T h e Facebook, Inc., et al. v. ConnectU, Inc., et al.
D ear Counsel: A copy of your notice of appeal/petition has been received in the Clerk's office of th e United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. T h e U.S. Court of Appeals docket number shown above has been assigned to this case. You must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number whenever you c o m m u n ic ate with this court regarding this case. Please furnish this docket n u m b e r immediately to the court reporter if you place an order, or have placed an o r d e r , for portions of the trial transcripts. The court reporter will need this docket n u m b er when communicating with this court. T h e due dates for designating and filing the reporter's transcript, if a p p lica b le, filing the parties' briefs and otherwise perfecting the appeal have b een set by the enclosed "Time Schedule Order," pursuant to applicable F R A P rules. These dates can be extended only by court order. Failure of the a p p ella n t to comply with the time schedule order will result in automatic d ism issa l of the appeal. 9th Cir. R. 42-1. T h e following information is being provided in an attempt to answer the most freq u en tly asked questions regarding the appellate process. Please review this in fo rm atio n very carefully. For convenience, we use the term "Circuit Rules" in stead of "Rules of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit" and "F R A P " instead of "Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure." E n c lo s e d with this letter is an appellate processing schedule along with a case p r o c e ss in g checklist to help you monitor the progress of your case. A p p ella n ts/P etitio n ers who are filing pro se should refer to the accompanying in fo rm a tio n sheet regarding the filing of informal briefs.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS F O R THE NINTH CIRCUIT
F IL E D
JAN 22 2009
M O L L Y C . D W YE R , C LE R K O F C O U R T U . S . C O U R T OF APPE A L S
T H E FACEBOOK, INC.; MARK ZU CK ERBERG , Plaintiffs - Appellees Cross Appellants, V. C O N N E C T U , INC., FKA ConnectU, L L C ; PACIFIC NORTHWEST S O F T W A R E , INC.; WAYNE CHANG; W IN S T O N WILLIAMS, Defendants, and C A M E R O N WINKLEVOSS; TYLER W I N K L E V O S S ; DIVYA NARENDRA, Defendants - Appellants Cross Appellees.
N o . 09-15133; 09-15021 D .C . No. 5:07-cv-01389-JW N o r th e r n District of California, S an Jose T IM E SCHEDULE ORDER
T h e parties shall meet the following cross appeal time schedule:
M o n ., April 6, 2009
T h e party(s) who filed the first appeal shall file and serv e the first brief on cross-appeal pursuant to FRAP 3 2 and 9th Cir. R. 32-1; T h e party(s) who filed the second appeal shall file an d serve the second brief on cross-appeal pursuant to FRAP 32 and 9th Cir. R. 32-1;
T u e., May 5, 2009
Thu., June 4, 2009
T h e third brief on cross-appeal shall be filed and serv ed pursuant to FRAP 32 and 9th Cir. R. 32-1;
T h e optional cross appeal reply brief shall be filed and served within fourteen d a y s of service of the third brief on cross appeal, pursuant to FRAP 32 and 9 th Cir. R. 32-1. F a ilu re of the appellant to comply with the Time Schedule Order will result in a u t o m a t ic dismissal of the appeal. 9th Cir. R. 42-1 A p p ella n ts/P etitio n ers without representation of counsel in a prisoner appeal m a y have their case submitted on the briefs and record without oral a rg u m en t, pursuant to FRAP 34(a). Within 10 days of the filing of the a p p ella n t's opening brief, parties may file a statement setting forth the rea so n s why, in the opinion of the parties, oral argument should be heard.
F O R THE COURT: M o lly C. Dwyer C le rk of Court
R u b e n Talavera D e p u ty Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?