The Facebook, Inc. v. Connectu, Inc et al

Filing 722

Proposed Order re 718 ConnectU's Rule 7-11 Motion re Scheduling Hearing re Contempt by Divya Narendra, Cameron Winklevoss, Tyler Winklevoss. (SeLegue, Sean) (Filed on 11/30/2009) Modified on 12/1/2009 ,(counsel failed to properly link to motion.)(cv, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
The Facebook, Inc. v. Connectu, LLC et al Doc. 722 Case5:07-cv-01389-JW Document722 Filed11/30/09 Page1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JEROME B. FALK, JR. (No. 39087) Email: jfalk@howardrice.com SEAN M. SELEGUE (No. 155249) Email: sselegue@howardrice.com JOHN P. DUCHEMIN (No. 250501) Email: jduchemin@howardrice.com HOWARD RICE NEMEROVSKI CANADY FALK & RABKIN A Professional Corporation Three Embarcadero Center, 7th Floor San Francisco, California 94111-4024 Telephone: 415/434-1600 Facsimile: 415/677-6262 Attorneys for CAMERON WINKLEVOSS, TYLER WINKLEVOSS and DIVYA NARENDRA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION THE FACEBOOK, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. CONNECTU, INC., et al., Defendants. No. C 07-01389 JW [PROPOSED] ORDER RE CONNECTU'S RULE 7-11 MOTION RE SCHEDULING HEARING RE CONTEMPT [PROPOSED] ORDER RE CONNECTU'S RULE 7-11 MOTION RE SCHED HRG C 07-01389-JW Dockets.Justia.com Case5:07-cv-01389-JW Document722 Filed11/30/09 Page2 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 For GOOD CAUSE shown, the Court hereby DENIES ConnectU, Inc.'s Civil Local Rule 7-11 Motion For A Telephonic Conference To Schedule A Hearing On An Order To Show Cause Re: Contempt Against The Founders And Finnegan. Any further motions regarding the ongoing litigation in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts should be filed with that court. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: _______________, 2009 HON. JAMES WARE U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE [PROPOSED] ORDER RE CONNECTU'S RULE 7-11 MOTION RE SCHED HRG C 07-01389-JW -1-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?