The Facebook, Inc. v. Connectu, Inc et al
Minute Entry: Arguments heard. Trustee to submit proposed order of disbursal (under seal). Defendants to notify Court whether Massachusetts case is going forward. Case continued to 12/5/11 at 9:00 am.Motion Hearing held on 11/28/2011 before James Ware (Date Filed: 11/28/2011) re 790 MOTION Administrative Relief to Attend Hearing by Telephone filed by Quinn Emanuel Urquhart Oliver & Hedges, LLP, 791 MOTION to Appear by Telephone , Administrative Request for Relief, filed by Boies, Schiller & Flexner LLP, 776 MOTION for Attorney Fees Partially Under Seal/Redacted filed by Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, L.L.P., 778 MOTION To Pay Lienholders And Complete The Exchange of Consideration - REDACTED VERSION filed by Tyler Winklevoss, Cameron Winklevoss, Divya Narendra. Status Conference set for 12/5/2011 09:00 AM in Courtroom 9, 19th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. James Ware. (Court Reporter Joan Columbini.) (sis, COURT STAFF) (Date Filed: 11/28/2011)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT of CALIFORNIA
Time in Court: 1 hr. 12 mins.
Judge: James Ware
November 28, 2011
Case No: C07-1389 JW
Case Title: The Facebook, Inc. v. Connectu, Inc., et al
For Plaintiff(s): Neel Chatterjee
For Defendant(s): Tyler Meade, Michael Schrag,, Greg Klein, Tom Mason, John Heller,
Alison Buchanan, Adam Wolfson
Court Appointed Trustee: David Barrett
Deputy Clerk: Susan Imbriani
Court Reporter: Joan Columbini
1. Motion for Attorney Fees
2. Motion to Pay Lienholders
MOTION/MATTER: ( x ) Taken under submission
Arguments heard. Trustee to submit a proposed order of disbursal, (under seal), which is
to include a payment amount for the trustee firm. Defendants to notify the court by close of
business 11/29/11, whether or not the Massachusetts case is going forward.
Case continued to December 5, 2011 at 9:00am for status.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?