Harmon v. Curry et al

Filing 35

ORDER by Judge Ronald M. Whyte Granting 31 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/23/2010)

1

2
.3 4 5 6 7

*E-FILED - 3/23/10*

8 9
10
11

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DNISION

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21

L.C. HARMON,
Petitioner,

No. C 07-1576 RMW (PR)

========== [PROPOSED] ORDER

v.
BEN CURRY, Warden,
Respondent.

This Court considered Respondent's Request for a One-Week Extension of Time to File an Answer, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Respondent's Request for a One-Week Extension of Time is GRANTED. Respondent shall file an answer no later than March 1,2010. If Petitioner chooses, he shall file and serve a traverse within thirty days of receiving the answer.

22
23 24 25 26 27

3/ _ _ Dated: _ _23/10 _ _ _ _ _ __
THE HONORABLE RONALD M. WHYTE United States District Judge

28
======= Order (C 07-1576 RMW CPR» [Proposed]