Ruiz et al v. Ed Richard Discing Inc. et al

Filing 49

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE. Order to Show Cause Hearing set for 3/26/2010 at 10:30 AM. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 3/8/2010. (jflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/8/2010)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 On September 8, 2008, the Court issued an order vacating the hearing date on Plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment, noting that Plaintiffs had filed the motion after the cut-off date for dispositive motions and inviting Plaintiffs to file a motion to extend the cut-off date. Plaintiffs did not file a motion to extend the cut-off date for dispositive motions, nor have they filed any documents at all since September 2008. Accordingly, Plaintiffs are hereby ordered to appear before the Court on March 26, 2010, at 10:30 a.m. and show cause why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 3/8/2010 __________________________________ JEREMY FOGEL United States District Judge
C a s e No. C 07-1593 JF (HRL) O R D E R TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE ( JF L C 2 )

**E-Filed 3/8/2010**

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

JOSE RUIZ, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ED RICHARD DISCING, INC., et al., Defendants.

Case Number C 07-1593 JF (HRL) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE