Syscan, Inc. v. Plustek, Inc. et al

Filing 128

STIPULATION AND ORDER Granting Stipulation on Page Limitations for Claim Construction Briefing re 126 Stipulation. Signed by Judge James Ware on 1/12/2010. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/12/2010)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
KLEIN, O'NEILL & SINGH, LLP

YUNG MING CHOU (NO. 172118) [e-mail] 39111 Paseo Padre Parkway, Suite 207 Fremont, CA 94538 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: 510-713-8690 Attorney for Plaintiff SYSCAN, INC.

SANG N. DANG (NO. 214558) [e-mail] KLEIN, O'NEILL & SINGH, LLP 43 Corporate Park Suite 204 Irvine, CA 92606 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: 949-955-1921 Attorneys for Defendants PLUSTEK INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

SYSCAN, INC., Plaintiff, vs. PLUSTEK INC. AND FUTUREWELL HOLDING LIMITED Defendants.

Case No. C 07-01603 JW STIPULATION REGARDING CLAIM CONSTRUCTION PROCEEDINGS AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

STIPULATION REGARDING CLAIM CONSTRUCTION PROCEEDINGS

Case No. C 07-01603 JW

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
KLEIN, O'NEILL & SINGH, LLP

WHEREAS, pursuant to the Order Denying Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment dated December 10, 2009 (Docket No. 125), the Court have set the date for a claim construction hearing for March 26, 2010 at 9:00 a.m., and have ordered the Parties to file their briefs in accordance with the Civil Local Rules and Patent Local Rules. WHEREAS, through their respective counsel of record, the Parties have met and conferred to discuss the schedule and other logistics relating to the claim construction proceedings. NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties, through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate and respectfully request the Court to order a schedule for the as follows:

PLEADING OR EVENT Simultaneous exchange of preliminary January 15, 2010 proposed construction of each claim term, phrase or clause, which the parties collectively have identified for claim construction purposes. (Patent L.R. 4-2(a)) Joint Claim Construction and Preliminary Prehearing Statement (Patent L.R. 4-3) Plaintiff's Opening Claim Construction Brief (Patent L.R. 4-5(a)) Defendants' Responsive Claim Construction Brief (Patent L.R. 4-5(b)) Plaintiff's Reply Claim Construction Brief (Patent L.R. 4-5(c)) Claim Construction Hearing January 29, 2010

DATE

February 19, 2010

March 5, 2010

March 12, 2010

March 26, 2010 at 9:00 a.m. (set forth in the Order Denying Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment - Docket No. 125)

Furthermore, due the numerous claim construction issues that would require
STIPULATION REGARDING CLAIM CONSTRUCTION PROCEEDINGS

1

Case No. C 07-01603 JW

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
KLEIN, O'NEILL & SINGH, LLP

briefing, the Parties, through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate and respectfully request the Court to order the following extension of page limitations for the respective claim construction briefs: BRIEFS Opening Claim Construction Brief Responsive Claim Construction Brief Reply Claim Construction Brief PAGE LIMITATIONS Not to exceed 45 pages Not to exceed 45 pages Not to exceed 20 pages

DATED: December 28, 2009 By /s/ Yung Ming Chou Yung Ming Chou Attorneys for Plaintiff SYSCAN, INC. DATED: December 28, 2009 KLEIN, O'NEILL & SINGH, LLP

By /s/ Sang N. Dang Sang N. Dang Attorneys for Defendants PLUSTEK INC. AND FUTUREWELL HOLDING LIMITED

STIPULATION REGARDING CLAIM CONSTRUCTION PROCEEDINGS

2

Case No. C 07-01603 JW

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
KLEIN, O'NEILL & SINGH, LLP

[PROPOSED] ORDER It is so ORDERED.
January 12, 2010 DATED: _____________________

_____________________________________ U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

STIPULATION REGARDING CLAIM CONSTRUCTION PROCEEDINGS

3

Case No. C 07-01603 JW

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
KLEIN, O'NEILL & SINGH, LLP

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on December 28, 2009, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of the Court in compliance with Civil Local Rule 5-5(b) using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of the filing to all counsel of record. /s/ Sang N. Dang Sang N. Dang

-1-