Brazil et al v. Dell Inc.

Filing 177

ORDER by Judge Whyte denying 160 Motion to Continue. (rmwlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/4/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS' ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE AND SET STATUS CONFERENCE--No. C-07-01700 RMW JAS E-FILED on 09/04/09 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION CHAD BRAZIL and STEVEN SEICK individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. DELL INC. and Does 1-10, Defendants. No. C-07-01700 RMW ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS' ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE AND SET STATUS CONFERENCE [Re Docket No. 160] Plaintiffs' August 31, 2009 motion to continue the class-certification hearing, presently set for September 25, 2009 and set a status conference is denied. DATED: 09/04/09 RONALD M. WHYTE United States District Judge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Notice of this document has been electronically sent to: Counsel for Plaintiff: Allison Stacy Elgart Michael W. Sobol Daniel Morley Kekoa Hattis Angelo Salvatore Parise Counsel for Defendants: Kim Brightwell Cory Michelle Mason Sinead O'Carroll Paul Schlaud C. Brandon Wisoff kbrightwell@reevesbrightwell.com cmason@fbm.com socarroll@reevesbrightwell.com pschlaud@reevesbrightwell.com bwisoff@fbm.com aelgart@lchb.com msobol@lchb.com dhattis@pariselaw.com parise@pariselaw.com Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel that have not registered for e-filing under the court's CM/ECF program. Dated: 09/04/09 JAS Chambers of Judge Whyte ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS' ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE AND SET STATUS CONFERENCE--No. C-07-01700 RMW JAS 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?