Michael Malone v. eBay, Inc.

Filing 497

ORDER by Judge Seeborg vacating hearing on (442)Motion to Compel in case 5:07-cv-01882-JF and recommending appointment of special master. (rslc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/14/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 *E-Filed 10/14/09* IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Before the Court is plaintiffs' motion to compel arising from their contentions that numerous deficiencies exist in a privilege log provided by defendant Ebay, which lists some 69,000 documents as being withheld under claims of attorney-client privilege, work product protection, or both. Plaintiffs and Ebay have each suggested in their briefing that a special master be appointed to resolve the issues presented by this motion. In view of the contentious nature of the parties' ongoing disputes, the plethora of issues they seek to resolve in the present motion, and the numerous times they have resorted to motion practice before this Court to address past discovery disputes, it is recommended to the presiding judge that a special master be appointed to hear the present matter as 1 ____________________________________/ IN RE EBAY SELLER ANTITRUST LITIGATION No. C 07-01882 JF (RS) ORDER VACATING HEARING ON PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO COMPEL AND RECOMMENDING APPOINTMENT OF SPECIAL MASTER NO. C 07-01882 JF (RS) ORDER 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 well as any and all future discovery disputes that may arise in this action. The hearing presently scheduled for October 21, 2009, is therefore vacated. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: October 14, 2009 RICHARD SEEBORG UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 NO. C 07-01882 JF (RS) ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?