Kim v. Still et al

Filing 6

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 4/16/07. (rssec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/16/2007)

Download PDF
Kim v. Still et al Doc. 6 Case 5:07-cv-01953-RS Document 6 Filed 04/16/2007 Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION SERGUEI FEDOROVICH KIM, v. Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE No. C 07-01953 RS *E-FILED 4/16/07* United United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DAVID STILL, et al. Defendants. / On March 26, 2007 plaintiff Serguei Fedorovich Kim, appearing through counsel, filed a "Complaint for Declaratory Judgment of Naturalization under 8 U.S.C. 1447(b) and 1421(c) and Writ of Mandamus" against David Still, District Director of U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services, and other government officials in their official capacities. Plaintiff alleges Defendants have failed to process his application for naturalization in a timely manner, apparently as a result of delays in obtaining a completed background check clearance from the Federal Bureau of Investigation. Plaintiff asserts that Defendants have violated 8 U.S.C. 1447(b), which provides: If there is a failure to make a determination under section 1446 of this title before the end of the 120-day period after the date on which the examination is conducted under such section, the applicant may apply to the United States district court for the district in which the applicant resides for a hearing on the matter. Such court has jurisdiction over the matter and may either determine the matter or remand the matter, with appropriate instructions, to the Service to determine the matter. Dockets.Justia.com Case 5:07-cv-01953-RS Document 6 Filed 04/16/2007 Page 2 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Plaintiff requests that this Court assume jurisdiction and act on his naturalization application. Good cause appearing therefor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: (1) The Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of the complaint and a copy of this Order upon counsel for Defendants, the Office of the United States Attorney. The Clerk of the Court also shall serve a copy of this Order upon Plaintiff. (2) Defendants shall, within sixty (60) days after receiving service of the complaint, file and serve upon Plaintiff an answer, showing cause why the relief prayed for should not be granted. At the time the answer is filed, Defendants shall lodge with the Court all records relevant to a determination of the issues presented by the complaint. If Defendants contend that Plaintiff has failed to exhaust administrative remedies as to any ground for relief asserted in the complaint, Defendants shall specify what administrative remedy remains available to Plaintiff. If Defendants waive or concede the issue of exhaustion, Defendants shall so state in their answer. (3) Plaintiff may file a response to the matters raised in the answer within twenty (20) United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 days after receiving the answer. (4) Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, the matter will be deemed submitted upon the filing of the response or upon the expiration of time to file a response. (5) No later than the time their respective responses hereunder are due, the parties shall make their determination regarding the issue of consent to the jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge and file the appropriate form. In the event any party declines to consent to the jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge, this action will be reassigned to a District Judge for further proceedings. (6) The Order Setting Initial Case Management Conference and ADR deadlines entered on April 6, 2007, in this action is hereby VACATED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 16, 2007 RICHARD SEEBORG United States Magistrate Judge 2 Case 5:07-cv-01953-RS Document 6 Filed 04/16/2007 Page 3 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT NOTICE OF THIS ORDER WAS ELECTRONICALLY PROVIDED TO: Martin J. Lawler mlawler@aboutvisas.com, mbayley@aboutvisas.com; ; hopefrye@comcast.net Dated: April 16, 2007 /s/ BAK Chambers of Magistrate Judge Richard Seeborg United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?