Displaylink Corporation v. Magic Control Technology Corporation

Filing 106

STIPULATION AND ORDER 105 of Dismissal With Prejudice, ***Civil Case Terminated. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 8/12/09. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/13/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JAMES C. YOON State Bar No. 177155 (jyoon@wsgr.com) STEFANI E. SHANBERG State Bar No. 206717 (sshanberg@wsgr.com) ROBIN L. BREWER State Bar No. 253686 (rbrewer@wsgr.com) WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI Professional Corporation 650 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050 Telephone: (650) 493-9300 Facsimile: (650) 565-5100 Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant DISPLAYLINK CORPORATION JOHN D. van LOBEN SELS State Bar No. 201354 (jvanlobensels@whgclaw.com) RICHARD F. CAULEY State Bar No. 109194 (rcauley@whgclaw.com) FRANKLIN E. GIBBS State Bar No. 189015 (fgibbs@whgclaw.com) WANG, HARTMANN, GIBBS & CAULEY Professional Corporation 2570 W. El Camino Real, Suite 440 Mountain View, CA 94040 Telephone: (650) 209-1230 Facsimile: (650) 209-1231 Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff MAGIC CONTROL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION *E-FILED - 8/12/09* DISPLAYLINK CORPORATION, a Washington ) Corporation, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) MAGIC CONTROL TECHNOLOGY, ) CORPORATION, a Taiwanese Corporation; ) ) Defendant. ) ) ) ) AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS ) ) CASE NO.: 5:07-CV-01998-RMW RELATED CASE NO.: 5:07-CV-05707RMW STIPULATION AND [] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE STIPULATION AND [] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE CASE NO. 07-CV-01998-RMW -1- 3706284_1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 costs. Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant DisplayLink Corporation ("DisplayLink") and Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff Magic Control Technology, Corporation ("MCT"), by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate that all claims for relief in the above identified action shall be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41 and pursuant to a confidential license agreement between the Parties. The Parties further stipulate that each party shall be responsible for its own fees and Respectfully submitted, Dated: June 25, 2009 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI Professional Corporation By: /s/ Stefani E. Shanberg Stefani E. Shanberg Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant DISPLAYLINK CORPORATION Dated: June 25, 2009 WANG, HARTMANN, GIBBS & CAULEY A Professional Corporation By: /s/ John D. van Loben Sels John D. van Loben Sels Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff MAGIC CONTROL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: ______________________ 8/12/09 ____________________________ The Honorable Ronald M. Whyte STIPULATION AND [] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE CASE NO. 07-CV-01998-RMW -1- 3706284_1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE CASE NO. 5:07-CV-01998-RMW ATTESTATION CLAUSE I, Stefani E. Shanberg, am the ECF User whose identification and password are being used to file this Stipulation. In compliance with General Order 45.X.B., I hereby attest that John D. van Loben Sels of Wang, Hartmann, Gibbs & Cauley, P.L.C. has concurred in this filling Dated: June 25, 2009 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI Professional Corporation By: /s/ Stefani E. Shanberg Stefani E. Shanberg Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant DISPLAYLINK CORPORATION -2- 3706284_1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?