Ewert v. eBay, Inc.

Filing 107

ORDER by Judge Whyte granting 104 Motion to Seal Document (rmwlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/8/2010)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER GRANTING EBAY'S MOTION TO FILE PORTIONS OF DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL CASE NO. 07 CV 02198 RMW UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION MICHAEL EWERT, on behalf of himself and for the benefit of all with common or general interest, any persons injured, and all others similarly situated, Plaint iff, v. EBAY INC., and DOES 1 THROUGH 100, inclusive Defendant. THE MISSING LINK, INC., d/b/a BATH PLUS INC., and JEFFREY MARKS individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaint iff, v. EBAY INC., Defendant. Case No. 07 cv 04487 RMW (PVT) Case No. 07 cv 02198 RMW (PVT) ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT EBAY INC.'S MOTION TO FILE PORTIONS OF DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Having reviewed Defendant eBay Inc.'s ("eBay") Motion to File Portions of Documents Under Seal and eBay's Declaration in support thereof, the Court finds the parties have demonstrated good cause to seal the portions of the following documents which have been redacted by eBay: eBay's Opposition to Plaintiff Michael Ewert's Motion for Class Certification ("eBay's Opposition Brief") Declaration of Jonathan Watkins in support of eBay's Opposition Brief eBay's Supplemental Responses to The Missing Link Inc.'s Interrogatories Transcript of eBay's 30(b)(6) Deposition with Deponent Nate Etter eBay's Expert Report, drafted by Dr. Stephen Prowse The Court hereby GRANTS Plaintiffs' Motion to File Portions of Documents Under Seal. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 8, 2010 By:_____________________________ Ronald M. Whyte United States District Judge 1. ORDER GRANTING EBAY'S MOTION TO FILE PORTIONS OF DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL CASE NO. 07 CV 02198 RMW

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?