Ewert v. eBay, Inc.

Filing 113

STIPULATION AND ORDER 112 to Continue Hearing Dates on Motions: Motion Hearing set for 4/23/2010 09:00 AM in Courtroom 6, 4th Floor, San Jose. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 3/17/10. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/17/2010)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 John R. Fabry, TSB No. 06768480 (entered Pro Hac Vice) jfabry@galyen.com Bailey & Galyen 18333 Egret Bay Blvd., Suite 120 Houston, TX 77058 Telephone 281.355.7744 Facsimile 281.355.5871 Charles S. Bishop, CSB No. 99335 cbishop@connbish.com CONNOR & BISHOP 44 Montgomery Street, Suite 1750 San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone 415.434.3006 Facsimile 415.434.1445 Patricia Carlson, TSB No. 00798094 (entered Pro Hac Vice) pcarltex@sbcglobal.net Carlson Law Office 3242 Monarch San Antonio, TX 78259 Telephone 210.289.4252 Facsimile 210.545.7607 Attorneys for Plaintiff UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA; SAN JOSE DIVISION MICHAEL EWERT, on Behalf of Himself and for the Benefit of All with Common or General Interest, Any Persons Injured, and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, vs. EBAY, INC., DOES 1 to 100, inclusive. Defendants. THE MISSING LINK, INC., d/b/a BATH PLUS, Inc., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, vs. EBAY, INC., Defendants. New Date: Time: Judge: Trial Date: April 23, 2010 9:00 a.m. Hon. Ronald M. Whyte Not yet set Case No. 07-CV- 04487-RMW STIPULATION AND [] ORDER CONTINUING HEARING DATES ON MOTIONS New Date: Time: Judge: Trial Date: April 23, 2010 9:00 a.m. Hon. Ronald M. Whyte Not yet set Case No. 07-CV-2189-RMW (PVT) STIPULATION AND [] ORDER CONTINUING HEARING DATES ON MOTIONS *E-FILED - 3/17/10* S T I P U L A T I O N AND [] ORDER CONTINUING HEARINGS ON MOTIONS Ewert v. eBay, Inc., et al. Page -1- USDC Case #07-CV-2198 RMW ======= ======= 3/17/10 ======= ========

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?