Securities And Exchange Commission v. Heinen et al

Filing 15

NOTICE of need for ADR Phone Conference (ADR L.R. 3-5 d) (Ehrlich, Miles) (Filed on 7/13/2007)

Download PDF
Securities And Exchange Commission v. Heinen et al Doc. 15 Case 5:07-cv-02214-JF Document 15 Filed 07/13/2007 Page 1 of 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, CASE NO. C-07-2214-JF Plaintiff(s), v. NANCY R. HEINEN AND FRED D. ANDERSON, NOTICE OF NEED FOR ADR PHONE CONFERENCE Defendant(s). ____________________________________/ Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and that they: 9 have not yet reached an agreement to an ADR process reques t an Early Settlement Conference with a Magistrate Judge 9 September 7, 2007 Date of Case Management Conference ___________________ The following counsel will participate in the ADR phone conference: Name Miles Ehrlich Robert L. Mitchell Party Representing Nancy R. Heinen Phone No. (510) 548-3600 E-Mail Address miles@ramsey-ehrlich.com mitchellr@sec.gov ___________________________________________________________________________ Securities and Exchange Comm'n (415) 705-2351 ___________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________ Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR Local Rule 3-5 require that lead trial counsel participate in a telephone conference with a member of the ADR Legal Staff before the Case Management Conference. The ADR Unit (adr@cand.uscourts.gov) will notify you of the date and time of your phone conference. July 13, 2007 Dated:___________ / / Robert L. Mitchell _s_____________________ Attorney for Plaintiff s _________ _/_/_Miles Ehrlich __________ Attorney for Defendant Ju_ __ 2007 Dated:__ly_13, ______ Rev 12.05 Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?