Securities And Exchange Commission v. Heinen et al
Filing
15
NOTICE of need for ADR Phone Conference (ADR L.R. 3-5 d) (Ehrlich, Miles) (Filed on 7/13/2007)
Securities And Exchange Commission v. Heinen et al
Doc. 15
Case 5:07-cv-02214-JF
Document 15
Filed 07/13/2007
Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION,
CASE NO. C-07-2214-JF
Plaintiff(s), v.
NANCY R. HEINEN AND FRED D. ANDERSON,
NOTICE OF NEED FOR ADR PHONE CONFERENCE
Defendant(s).
____________________________________/
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and that they: 9 have not yet reached an agreement to an ADR process reques t an Early Settlement Conference with a Magistrate Judge
9
September 7, 2007 Date of Case Management Conference ___________________
The following counsel will participate in the ADR phone conference: Name
Miles Ehrlich Robert L. Mitchell
Party Representing
Nancy R. Heinen
Phone No.
(510) 548-3600
E-Mail Address
miles@ramsey-ehrlich.com mitchellr@sec.gov
___________________________________________________________________________
Securities and Exchange Comm'n (415) 705-2351
___________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________
Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR Local Rule 3-5 require that lead trial counsel participate in a telephone conference with a member of the ADR Legal Staff before the Case Management Conference. The ADR Unit (adr@cand.uscourts.gov) will notify you of the date and time of your phone conference.
July 13, 2007 Dated:___________
/ / Robert L. Mitchell _s_____________________ Attorney for Plaintiff s _________ _/_/_Miles Ehrlich __________ Attorney for Defendant
Ju_ __ 2007 Dated:__ly_13, ______
Rev 12.05
Dockets.Justia.com
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?