Securities And Exchange Commission v. Heinen et al

Filing 29

STIPULATION AND ORDER Continuing Filing Deadlines and Hearing Date. Defendant's opposition brief due by 12/10/2007. Non-party Howell's reply due by 12/21/2007. Motion hearing on motion to motion to quash continued to 1/15/2008, 10:00 AM. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 11/26/2007. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/26/2007)

Download PDF
Securities And Exchange Commission v. Heinen et al Doc. 29 Case 5:07-cv-02214-JF Document 29 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 MILES EHRLICH (BAR NO. 237954) miles@ramsey-ehrlich.com ISMAIL RAMSEY (BAR NO. 189820) izzy@ramsey-ehrlich.com RAMSEY & EHRLICH LLP 803 Hearst Avenue Berkeley, CA 94710 (510) 548-3600 (Tel) (510) 291-3060 (Fax) Attorneys for Defendant Nancy R. Heinen FOLEY & LARDNER LLP ONE MARITIME PLAZA, SIXTH FLOOR SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111 TELEPHONE: 415.434.4484 FACSIMILE: 415.434.4507 THOMAS F. CARLUCCI, BAR NO. 135767 tcarlucci@foley.com ERIN J. HOLLAND, BAR NO. 233305 eholland@foley.com FOLEY & LARDNER LLP 555 SOUTH FLOWER STREET, SUITE 3500 LOS ANGELES, CA 90071 TELEPHONE: 213.972.4500 FACSIMILE: 213.486.0065 PAMELA L. JOHNSTON, BAR NO. 132558 pjohnston@foley.com Attorneys for Non-Party Wendy Howell *ORDER E-FILED 11/26/2007* UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, vs. NANCY R. HEINEN, Defendant. Case No.: C-07-2214 (JF) XXXXXXXX JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING FILING DEADLINES AND HEARING DATE Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd Date: December 18, 2007 Time: 10:00 a.m. Dept: Courtroom 2, 5th Floor Case No. C-07-2214 (JF) SFCA_882947.1 STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER xxxxxxxx Dockets.Justia.com Case 5:07-cv-02214-JF Document 29 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 2 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Defendant Nancy Heinen ("Heinen") and Non-Party Wendy Howell ("Howell"), through their respective counsel of record, hereby submit this stipulation to continue the hearing on Howell's motion to quash from December 18, 2007 to January 15, 2008 at 10:00 a.m. THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED that, due to the need for additional time, by and between Non-Party Howell and Defendant Heinen, by and through their respective counsel of record: 1. Defendant Heinen's opposition to Non-Party Howell's motion to quash shall be filed and served via ECF no later than December 10, 2007 rather than on November 27, 2007; 2. Non-Party Howell's reply to Defendant Heinen's opposition shall be filed and served via ECF no later than December 21, 2007, rather than on December 4, 2007. 3. The hearing set for December 18, 2007, at 10:00 a.m., be continued to January 15, 2008, at 10:00 a.m., or such other date and time as the Court may set. DATED: November 20, 2007 RAMSEY & EHRLICH LLP By: /s/ Ismail Ramsey Miles Ehrlich Ismail Ramsey Attorneys for Defendant Nancy Heinen DATED: November 20, 2007 FOLEY & LARDNER LLP By: /s/ Pamela L. Johnston Pamela L. Johnston Foley & Lardner, LLP Attorneys for Non-Party Wendy Howell STIPULATION AND xxxxxxxxxORDER PROPOSED SFCA_882947.1 Case No. C-07-2214 (JF) Case 5:07-cv-02214-JF Document 29 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 3 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 26 DATED: November __, 2007 By: ORDER Pursuant to the foregoing STIPULATION of the parties: 1. Defendant Heinen's opposition to Non-Party Howell's motion to quash shall be filed and served via ECF no later than December 10, 2007. 2. Non-Party Howell's reply to Defendant Heinen's opposition shall be filed and served via ECF no later than December 21, 2007. 3. The hearing on this matter is set for January 15, 2008, at 10:00 a.m. Hon. Howard R. Lloyd Magistrate Judge, United States District Court xxxxxxxx STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER SFCA_882947.1 Case No. C-07-2214 (JF)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?