Yu v. Southland Taste Restaurant Incoporated et al
Filing
53
AMENDED STIPULATION AND ORDER TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE re 52 Stipulation filed by Jie Yu, Min Wang. Signed by Judge Patricia V. Trumbull on November 17, 2008. (pvtlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/17/2008)
Case 5:07-cv-02274-PVT
Document 52
Filed 11/15/2008
Page 1 of 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
ADAM WANG, Bar No. 201233 LAW OFFICES OF ADAM WANG 12 South First Street, Suite 613 SAN JOSE, CA 95113 Tel: (408) 292-1040 Fax: (408) 416-0248 Attorneys for Plaintiffs BING RUI (SBN 203521) U.S.-CHINA LAW GROUP 3031 TISCH WAY, SUITE 500 San Jose, California 95128 Attorney for Defendants UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JIE YU, ET AL Plaintiffs, vs. Case No.: C07-2274 PVT AMENDED STIPULATION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE & ORDER THEREON
SOUTHLAND TASTE RESTAURANT INCORPORATED, ET AL. Defendants Plaintiffs, Jie Yu and Min Wang, and Defendants, Southland Taste Restaurant Incorporated, Ching Tung Chen, Chin Shih Yang Chen, I Chen Chen, Southland Flavor Cafe, Zhi Yu Deng, through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate as follows: 1. Plaintiffs filed a complaint seeking, among other things, unpaid overtime under
Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq. ("FLSA"). 2. Parties reached a settlement that resolves all claims of Plaintiffs, requiring
Plaintiffs to dismiss this case with prejudice. 3. prejudice. On September 18, 2008, Parties filed a stipulation to dismiss this case with
1 AMENDED STIPULATION TO DISMISS Yu, et al. v. Southland Taste Restaurant, et al.
C07-2274 PVT
Case 5:07-cv-02274-PVT
Document 52
Filed 11/15/2008
Page 2 of 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
4.
On October 10, 2008, this Court denied the Stipulation to Dismiss, on the ground
that FLSA mandates award of attorney's fees for FLSA claims when an order to dismiss the action is required. As such, the Court ordered parties to show cause why parties failed to stipulate to dismiss under FED. R. CIV. PRO. 41(a) which does not involve an order to dismiss. 5. By this Amended Stipulation, parties hereby clarify that the parties meant to
stipulate to dismiss under FED. R. CIV. PRO. 41 (a) without a Court order; and respectfully so stipulate.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, Dated: November 15, 2008 By: /s/ ADAM WANG Adam Wang Attorney for Plaintiffs
Dated: November 15, 2008
By: ___/s/ Bing Rui _ BING RUI Attorney for Defendants
XXXXXXXXXXX [PROPOSED] ORDER
______________________________________________________
Pursuant to party's stipulation, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk should close this case.
The Order to Show Cause dated October 10, 2008 is hereby dissolved.
17 Dated: November _______, 2008
______________________ Patricia V. Trumbull United States Magistrate Judge
2 AMENDED STIPULATION TO DISMISS Yu, et al. v. Southland Taste Restaurant, et al.
C07-2274 PVT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?