Seidel v. United States of America

Filing 8

Judicial Referral for Purpose of Determining Relationship of Cases. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 6/18/07. (rmwlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/18/2007)

Download PDF
Seidel v. United States of America Doc. 8 Case 5:07-cv-03141-JF Document 8 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: 6/18/07 Ronald M. Whyte United States District Judge Plaintiff has filed a motion for temporary restraining order in case C-07-03141 RMW. Pursuant to Civil L.R. 3-12(c), this court sua sponte refers the above-captioned cases to District Judge Jeremy Fogel to consider whether these cases are related. v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. v. THOMAS EVERETT SEIDEL, SR., VICKI RENEE SEIDEL, and RANDY LEE WILSON, Defendants. VICKI R. SEIDEL, Plaintiff, No. C-07-03141 RMW UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, No. CR-06-00539 JF JUDICIAL REFERRAL FOR PURPOSE OF DETERMINING RELATIONSHIP OF CASES IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION E-FILED: 6/18/07 JUDICIAL REFERRAL FOR PURPOSE OF DETERMINING RELATIONSHIP OF CASES--C-07-02989 RMW SPT Dockets.Justia.com Case 5:07-cv-03141-JF Document 8 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 2 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Notice of this document has been electronically sent to: Counsel for Plaintiff: Robert Alan Jones Counsel for Defendants: (NO SERVICE) rajltd@aol.com, jean@rajlv.com Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel that have not registered for e-filing under the court's CM/ECF program. Dated: 6/18/07 SPT Chambers of Judge Whyte JUDICIAL REFERRAL FOR PURPOSE OF DETERMINING RELATIONSHIP OF CASES--C-07-02989 RMW SPT 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?