Coupons, Inc. v. Stottlemire

Filing 115

(Proposed) Order Denying Administrative Motion to Extend Time to Answer Third Amended Complaint re #114 by Coupons, Inc. (Goteiner, Neil) (Filed on 11/25/2008) Text modified on 11/26/2008 (bw, COURT STAFF).

Coupons, Inc. v. Stottlemire

Doc. 115

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Farella Braun & Martel LLP 235 Montgomery Street, 17th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 [phone]

Neil A. Goteiner (State Bar No. 083524) Dennis M. Cusack (State Bar No. 124988) Carly O. Alameda (State Bar No. 244424) Farella Braun & Martel LLP 235 Montgomery Street, 17th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] E-mail: [e-mail], [e-mail], [e-mail] Attorneys for Plaintiff COUPONS, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION COUPONS, INC., Plaintiff, vs. JOHN STOTTLEMIRE, and DOES 1-10, Defendants. Case No. 5:07-CV-03457 HRL [PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER THE THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT Judge: Honorable Howard R. Lloyd

The Court has considered Defendant's Administrative Motion to Extend Time to Answer the Third Amended Complaint, and its supporting declaration, and Coupons' Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Extend Time to Answer the Third Amended Complaint. Finding that good cause does not exist for the extension, the Motion is DENIED. Defendant John Stottlemire's answer to Coupons' Third Amended Complaint will be due December 15, 2008. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's Administrative Motion to Extend Time to Answer the Third Amended Complaint is DENIED. ____________________________ Hon. Howard R. Lloyd United States Magistrate Judge

DATED: __________________

[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT / USDC/NDC/SJ 5:07-CV-03457 HRL

22675\1764401.1

Dockets.Justia.com