Coupons, Inc. v. Stottlemire

Filing 118

ORDER by Judge Howard R. Lloyd granting #108 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #112 MOTION Administrative Relief Requesting that the Court set a Status Conference for December 16, 2008 or as soon thereafter as is possible, #108 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer the Third Amended Complaint ; denying #112 Motion Status Conference (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/1/2008)

Coupons, Inc. v. Stottlemire

Doc. 118

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NOT FOR CITATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION COUPONS, INC., Plaintiff, v. JOHN STOTTLEMIRE, Defendant. / Pro se defendant requests an extended deadline of January 31, 2009 to file his answer. Due to unforeseen circumstances, defendant will be moving and searching for housing during the months of December, 2008 and January, 2009. Plaintiff opposes the motion in part, agreeing that some additional time should be given, and proposing December 15, 2008 as a reasonable due date. In light of defendant's pro se status, and for good cause shown, the court now GRANTS defendant's motion. His answer shall be filed on or before January 31, 2009. Defendant also requests that the court set a status conference for December 16, 2008, to discuss the recent failure of the parties settlement agreement. Plaintiff opposes the request as unnecessary at this time. The court DENIES defendant's request for a status conference. However, because the case management schedule has been vacated, the court now sets a case management conference for February 17, 2009 at 1:30 pm in Courtroom 2, fifth floor, San Jose Case No. CV 07-03457 HRL ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO THE THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT Re: Docket Nos. 108, 112 * E-filed 12/01/08*

United States District Court

11
For the Northern District of California

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

District Court. The parties' shall file a joint case management statement not later than February 10, 2009.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated:12/01/08

HOWARD R. LLOYD

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

United States District Court

11
For the Northern District of California

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

THIS SHALL CERTIFY THAT A COPY OF THIS ORDER WILL BE SENT VIA ECF. Counsel are responsible for providing copies of this order to co-counsel. Dated: 12/01/08

/s/ mpk Chambers of Magistrate Judge Lloyd

United States District Court

11
For the Northern District of California

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3