O'Keeffe's Inc. v. Technical Glass Products Anemostat and Pilkington, PLC

Filing 155

ORDER DISMISSING CASE PURSUANT TO STIPULATION. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 11/22/2011. (lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/22/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Jeffrey S. Love (State Bar No. 195068) jeffrey.love@klarquist.com Todd M. Siegel (Pro Hac Vice) todd.siegel@klarquist.com Klarquist Sparkman, LLP 121 S.W. Salmon Street, Suite 1600 Portland, OR 97204-2988 Telephone: (503) 595-5300 Facsimile: (503) 595-5301 Kevin H. Vanderleeden vanderleeden@ip-lawyers.com MCCORMICK PAULDING & HUBER LLP 1350 Main Street Sovereign Bank Building 5th Floor Springfield, MA 01103 T: 413-736-5401, Ext. 1414 F: 413-733-4543 John B. Scherling (State Bar No. 122234) jscherling@sughrue.com SUGHRUE MION, PLLC 4250 Executive Square, Suite 900 La Jolla, California 92037 Telephone: (858-795-1180 Facsimile: (858) 795-1199 John T. Callahan (pro hac vice) jcallahan@sughrue.com SUGHRUE MION, PLLC 2100 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, D.C. Telephone: (202) 293-7060 Facsimile: (202) 293-7860 Mark I. Schickman (State Bar No. 62653) schickman@freelandlaw.com FREELAND COOPER & FOREMAN LLP 150 Spear Street, Suite 1800 San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: (415) 541-0200 Facsimile: (415) 495-4332 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 20 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 21 22 O'KEEFE'S, INC. a California corporation, 23 24 25 Plaintiff, v. TECHNICAL GLASS PRODUCTS, ANEMOSTAT AND PILKINGTON PLC, CASE NO.: 07-3535 LHK STIPULATED DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE AND TOLLING AGREEMENT AND ORDER 26 Defendants. 27 28 1 STIPULATION RE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, CASE NO. 07-01986 VRW {00157098} 1 Pursuant to the October 28, 2011 Order of the Court, the parties to the above captioned action 2 (“the parties”) hereby stipulate to dismiss the above action without prejudice. 3 limitations and other time limitations, whether by court rule or otherwise, on all claims and 4 counterclaims and prayers for costs and attorney fees, are hereby tolled until thirty days after a full 5 and final determination of all reexamination proceedings of the patent asserted in this lawsuit 6 currently pending before the United States Patent and Trademark Office, including the exhaustion of 7 all appeals and the time deadline for filing appeals therefrom. As the intent of this agreement is to 8 preserve and reserve all rights of each party as those rights exist as of the date of entry of the Order on 9 this Stipulation through the foregoing thirty-day period, the passage of time during that period shall 10 not be raised as the basis of a claim or defense by any party. 11 IT IS SO STIPULATED AND AGREED. 12 Dated: November 16, 2011 All statutes of FREELAND COOPER & FOREMAN LLP 13 14 By _____/s/Mark I. Schickman_____________________ MARK I. SCHICKMAN Attorneys for Plaintiff, Counterdefendant and Counterclaimant O'KEEFFE'S, INC. 15 16 17 Dated November 16, 2011 KLARQUIST SPARKMAN, LLP 18 19 By _____/s/ Todd M. Siegel________________________ JEFFREY S. LOVE TODD M. SIEGEL Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant TECHNICAL GLASS PRODUCTS 20 21 22 23 Dated: November 16, 2011 MCCORMICK, PAULDING & HUBER, LLP 24 25 26 By _____/s/ Kevin H. Vanderleeden_________________ KEVIN H. VANDERLEEDEN Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant ANEMOSTAT 27 28 2 STIPULATION RE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, CASE NO. 07-01986 VRW {00157098} 1 Dated: November 16, 2011 SUGHRUE MION, PLLP 2 By _____/s/ John B. Scherling______________________ JOHN T. CALLAHAN JOHN B. SCHERLING Attorneys for Defendant PILKINGTON PLC 3 4 5 ORDER 6 7 8 9 10 11 Pursuant to the Stipulation of the parties set forth above, the above captioned action is dismissed without prejudice. November 22, 2011 Dated: _____________________ Honorable Lucy H. Koh United States District Judge 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 STIPULATION RE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, CASE NO. 07-01986 VRW {00157098}

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?