Le v. USA
Filing
1
ORDER. Signed by Judge James Ware on 12/14/09. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/14/2009)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Untied States of America, Plaintiff, v. 12 Dung Van Le, 13 Defendant. 14 15 Presently before the Court is Defendant's Motion to Modify Sentence Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 16 17 failed to request a four count reduction at his sentencing based on his status as a Vietnam War 18 refugee. (Motion at 2.) 19 A prisoner who is in custody under the sentence of a federal court who claims the right to be 20 released may move the court to vacate, set aside, or correct the sentence on the grounds that (1) the 21 sentence violates the Constitution or laws of the United States; (2) the court did not have jurisdiction 22 to impose the sentence; or (3) the sentence was in excess of the maximum authorized by law or is 23 otherwise subject to collateral attack. 28 U.S.C. § 2255. When evaluating a motion brought under § 24 2255, a court must issue an order directing the respondent to show cause why the motion should not 25 26 27 28 (hereafter, Motion, Docket Item No. 1098.) Unless otherwise noted, all citing references are to Docket No. C 98-20060. Defendant pleaded guilty to aiding and abetting the use and carrying of firearms in connection with an armed robbery; he is currently serving a 130 month sentence. (See Docket Item Nos. 524, 746.)
1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION NO. CR 98-20060 JW NO. C 07-03720 JW ORDER DISMISS MOTION TO MODIFY SENTENCE PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 2255 WITH PREJUDICE AS UNTIMELY /
United United States District Court
11
For the Northern District of California
§ 2255.1 Defendant contends that he was denied effective assistance of counsel when his attorney
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
be granted unless it plainly appears from the "motion and the files and records of the case . . . that the prisoner is entitled to no relief." Id. Section 2255 motions must be brought within one year of the latest of the following: (1) (2) (3) (4) the date on which the judgment of conviction becomes final; the date on which the impediment to making a motion created by governmental action in violation of the Constitution or laws of the United States is removed, if the movant was prevented from making a motion by such governmental action; the date on which the right asserted was initially recognized by the Supreme Court, if that right has been newly recognized by the Supreme Court and made retroactively applicable to cases on collateral review; or the date on which the facts supporting the claim or claims presented could have been discovered through the exercise of due diligence.
8 9 10
28 U.S.C. § 2255. Defendant pleaded guilty on February 27, 2001 and was sentenced on May 6, 2002. By the terms of the plea agreement, Defendant waived any right to appeal. (See Docket Item No. 525.) Defendant filed the current Motion on July 17, 2007, more than five years after his judgment of conviction became final. Thus, Defendant has failed to file within the statute of limitations.2 Accordingly, the Court DISMISSES Defendant's Motion to Modify Sentence with prejudice as untimely.
United States District Court
11
For the Northern District of California
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Dated: December 14, 2009 JAMES WARE United States District Judge
On March 23, 2004, the parties filed a Stipulation to correct the judgment and commitment, which the Court approved. (Docket Item No. 932.) Even if the Court were to give Defendant this later date in light of the amended judgment, Defendant's Motion would still be untimely since it was filed in 2007, nearly three years later. 2
2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT COPIES OF THIS ORDER HAVE BEEN DELIVERED TO: U.S. Attorney's Office 150 Almaden Blvd., Suite 900 San Jose, CA 95113-2009 Dung Van Le BOP Reg. #49128 2001-Rickabaugh Drive PO Box 7001 Big Spring, TX 79720
Dated: December 14, 2009
Richard W. Wieking, Clerk By: /s/ JW Chambers Elizabeth Garcia Courtroom Deputy
10
United States District Court
11
For the Northern District of California
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?