Lenz v. Universal Music Group Inc. et al
Filing
153
CORRECTED ORDER RE: 129 DENYING MOTION TO SEAL. Please disregard 151 . (rslc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/27/2009)
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 STEPHANIE LENZ, v. Plaintiff, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION NO. C 07-3783 JF (RS) CORRECTED ORDER DENYING MOTION TO SEAL *E-Filed 8/27/09*
United States District Court
11
For the Northern District of California
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
UNIVERSAL MUSIC CORP., et al. Defendants.
/
With its motion to compel, Universal Music Corp. filed an administrative motion to permit filing under seal certain "confidential" portions of its reply that quoted Lenz's communications with non-lawyer Theryn Fleming. In light of the order de-designating communications with Fleming, nothing in the quoted portions in the reply warrant sealing. Sealing of the redacted portions of Universal's reply brief is not necessary or appropriate. Universal shall e-file an unredacted copy of its brief, if it has not already done so. IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
8/27/09
RICHARD SEEBORG United States Magistrate Judge
1
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
