Louis Vuitton Malletier, S.A. v. Akanoc Solutions, Inc. et al

Filing 301

STIPULATION AND ORDER Setting Date for Continued Judgment Debtor Examination re 299 Stipulation. Judgment Debtor Exam set for 8/23/2010 09:00 AM in Courtroom 8, 4th Floor, San Jose. Signed by Judge James Ware on 7/13/2010. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/13/2010)

Download PDF
Louis Vuitton Malletier, S.A. v. Akanoc Solutions, Inc. et al Doc. 301 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 J. Andrew Coombs (SBN 123881) andy@coombspc.com Annie S. Wang (SBN 243027) annie@coombspc.com J. Andrew Coombs, A Prof. Corp. 517 East Wilson Avenue, Suite 202 Glendale, California 91206 Telephone: (818) 500-3200 Facsimile: (818) 500-3201 Attorneys for Plaintiff Louis Vuitton Malletier, S.A. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (SAN JOSE) Louis Vuitton Malletier, S.A., v. Plaintiff, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. C07-3952 JW [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING CONTINUANCE OF DEBTOR EXAMINATION OF STEVE CHEN Akanoc Solutions, Inc., et al. Defendants. In light of the request of the Parties, and good cause being shown, the Joint Stipulation re Continuance of Debtor Examination of Steve Chen is hereby GRANTED and Steve Chen is ordered to appear for examination re enforcement of judgment of judgment debtor on August 23, 9:00 ________________, 2010, at ______, a.m. in Courtroom 8, 4th Floor of the United States District Court, Northern District of California, 280 South 1st Street, San Jose, California 95113. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: July 13, 2010 _______________________________________ Hon. James Ware United States District Judge PRESENTED BY: J. Andrew Coombs, A Professional Corp. By: _/s/ J. Andrew Coombs___________________ J. Andrew Coombs Annie S. Wang Attorneys for Plaintiff Louis Vuitton Malletier, S.A. Louis Vuitton v. Akanoc, et al.: [Proposed] Order re Continuance of Debtor Examination -1- Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?