v. PIF Income Fund et al

Filing 60

CONSENT ORDER GRANTING SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEY re 54 by Cuttyhunk Fund, Ltd., Cannell Capital, L.L.C., Tonga Partners, L.P., Anegada Master Fund, Ltd. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 10/22/09. (dlm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/23/2009)

Download PDF
AO 154 (10/03) Substitution of Attorney UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Northern District of California ADMIRAL INSURANCE COMPANY, et al. Plaintiff (s), CONSENT ORDER GRANTING SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEY CASE NUMBER: C-07-4185-JF V. SONICBLUE, INC., et al. Defendant (s), Tonga Partners, L.P.; Anegada Master Fund, Ltd.; Cuttyhunk Fund Ltd.; and Notice is hereby given that, subject to approval by the court, Cannell Capital LLC (Party (s) Name) substitutes Glenn P. Zwang,Esq. (Name of New Attorney) , State Bar No. 112295 as counsel of record in place of Bartko, Zankel, Tarrant & Miller. (Name of Attorney (s) Withdrawing Appearance) Contact information for new counsel is as follows: Firm Name: Address: Telephone: E-Mail (Optional): Glenn P. Zwang, Esq. 333 Market Street, 25th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94105 (415) 227-0900 gzwang@buchalter.com Tonga Partners, L.P.; Anegada Master Fund, Ltd.; Cuttyhunk Fund Ltd.; and Cannell Capital LLC By: CANNELL CAPITAL LLC By: /s/ J. Carlo Cannell (Signature of Party (s)) Facsimile (415) 227-0770 I consent to the above substitution. Date: October 12 , 2009 I consent to being substituted. Date: October 19, 2009 BARTKO, ZANKEL, TARRANT AND MILLER By: /s/ Robert H. Bunzel (Signature of Former Attorney (s)) I consent to the above substitution. October 20, 2009 Date: By: /s/ Glenn P. Zwang (Signature of New Attorney) The substitution of attorney is hereby approved and so ORDERED. Date: 10/22/09 Judge [Note: A separate consent order of substitution must be filed by each new attor ey wishing to enter an appearance.] n American LegalNet, Inc. www.FormsWorkflow.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?