Fredenburg v. County of Santa Clara et al

Filing 192

ORDER re #190 Ex Parte Petition for Approval of Minors' Compromise filed by Helen Fredenburg, Matt Fredenburg. Signed by Judge James Ware on 5/4/11. (sis, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/4/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION NO. C 07-4412 JW Matt Fredenburg, et al., Plaintiffs, 11 ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR EX PARTE PETITION FOR APPROVAL OF MINORS’ COMPROMISE v. For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 County of Santa Clara, et al., 13 Defendants. / 14 15 Presently before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Ex Parte Petition for Approval of Minors’ 16 Compromise. (hereafter, “Petition,” Docket Item No. 190.) Plaintiffs represent that the Court must 17 approve the minors’ compromise before City Defendants will be able to obtain final approval and 18 purchase annuities for use in the settlement. (Petition at 2.) Although in their ex parte petition, 19 Plaintiffs represent that Defendants do not object to the plan, the Court finds that it would benefit 20 from having Defendants’ position stated in a formal brief. Accordingly, on or before May 13, 2011, 21 Defendants shall file their Response to Plaintiffs’ Petition. At that time the Court will either take the 22 Motion under submission without oral argument or set a hearing date, if necessary. 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: May 4, 2011 JAMES WARE United States District Chief Judge 1 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT COPIES OF THIS ORDER HAVE BEEN DELIVERED TO: 2 Dennis R. Ingols Douglas D. Durward Kevin E. Gilbert Robert Ross Powell David Michael Rollo Melissa R. Kiniyalocts Kimberly E. Colwell Tricia L. Hynes 3 4 5 6 7 Dated: May 4, 2011 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk 8 By: 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 /s/ JW Chambers Susan Imbriani Courtroom Deputy

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?