Securities And Exchange Commission v. Berry
Filing
271
STIPULATION AND ORDER 260 Concerning Evidentiary Objections on Briefing for Motions for Partial Summary Judgment. Motion Hearing on Cross-Motions for Summary Reset to 8/26/2011 9:00 AM. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 7/22/11. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/22/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
JAMES N. KRAMER (STATE BAR NO. 154709)
jkramer@orrick.com
JAMES A. MEYERS (ADMITTED PRO HAC VICE)
jmeyers@orrick.com
NANCY E. HARRIS (STATE BAR NO. 197042)
nharris@orrick.com
REBECCA F. LUBENS (STATE BAR NO. 240683)
rlubens@orrick.com
ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP
The Orrick Building
405 Howard Street
San Francisco, CA 94105-2669
Telephone:
415-773-5700
Facsimile:
415-773-5759
Attorneys for Defendant
LISA C. BERRY
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
SAN JOSE DIVISION
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
*E-FILED - 7/22/11*
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION,
Plaintiff,
vs.
LISA C. BERRY,
Defendant.
Case No. C 07-04431 RMW (HRL)
JOINT STIPULATION AND []
ORDER CONCERNING EVIDENTIARY
OBJECTIONS ON BRIEFING FOR
MOTIONS FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY
JUDGMENT
Judge: Judge Ronald M. Whyte
Dept: 7
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JOINT STIPULATION AND [] ORDER
CONCERNING EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS
CASE NO. C 07-04431-RMW (HRL)
1
WHEREAS, Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission and Defendant Lisa C. Berry
2
(each a “Party” and, collectively, the “Parties”) have submitted respective Motions for Partial
3
Summary Judgment (Dkt. 237 & 254) (the “Motions”) in the above-captioned action;
4
5
WHEREAS, the Parties anticipate filing opposition briefs concerning the Motions on
July 15, 2011 and reply briefs on July 29, 2011;
6
7
WHEREAS, the record in this action is voluminous on account of a multitude of
documents and deposition testimony in this and related actions;
8
WHEREAS, each Party anticipates having objections to evidence presented by the other
9
Party in the Motions, and may have objections to the evidence presented in the oppositions and
10
replies thereto;
11
WHEREAS, having met and conferred and agreed that, notwithstanding Civil Local
12
Rule 7-3, which requires that objections must be contained within opposition and reply briefs,
13
separate filings consolidating and setting forth each Party’s objections to evidence cited by the
14
other Party would be appropriate in light of the voluminous nature of the record; and
15
WHEREAS, the Parties further believe that separate filings, served and filed after the
16
submission of briefing on the Motions but in advance of the hearing thereon, would be in the
17
interest of efficiency and judicial economy for Court and the Parties.
18
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AS FOLLOWS:
19
1.
20
Motions and oppositions and replies thereto on August 5, 2011.
21
22
Each Party shall separately file and serve its objections to evidence cited in the
2.
Each Party shall file and serve responses to the other Party’s evidentiary objections
on August 10, 2011.
23
24
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
25
//
26
//
27
//
28
-1-
JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER
CONCERNING EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS
CASE NO. C 07-04431-RMW (HRL)
1
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
2
3
Dated: July 11, 2011
4
5
6
/s/ Robert L. Tashjian
Robert L. Tashjian
tashjianr@sec.gov
44 Montgomery Street, Suite 2600
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: 415-705-2500
Facsimile: 415-705-2501
7
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Securities and Exchange Commission
8
ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP
9
10
Dated: July 11, 2011
11
12
13
/s/ Rebecca F. Lubens
Rebecca F. Lubens
rlubens@orrick.com
405 Howard Street
San Francisco, California 94105
Telephone:
415-773-5700
Facsimile:
415-773-5759
Attorneys for Defendant Lisa Berry
14
15
16
I, Rebecca F. Lubens, am the ECF User whose User ID and password are being used to file
this Stipulation. In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that the above-listed
signatories have concurred in this filing.
17
18
*
*
*
19
20
ORDER
21
22
23
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. The Court resets the motion hearing
set for August 12, 2011 to August 26, 2011 at 9:00 AM.
24
25
26
7/22/11
Dated: _________________________
________________________________
Hon. Ronald M. Whyte
United States District Court Judge
27
28
-2-
JOINT STIPULATION AND [] ORDER
CONCERNING EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS
CASE NO. C 07-04431-RMW (HRL)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?