Acticon Technologies LLC v. Pretec Electronics Corporation et al

Filing 142

***PLEASE DISREGARD, POSTED IN ERROR*** AMENDED JUDGMENT AGAINST C-ONE TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 6/28/2010. (jflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/28/2010) Modified on 6/28/2010 (jflc2, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 The Court having entered the default of Defendant C-One Technology Corporation on March 30, 2009, Plaintiff Acticon Technologies LLC ("Acticon") having filed its request for default judgment, and the Court having fully considered Acticon's request for default judgment against C-One Technology Corporation, C a s e Number 07-04507 JF (HRL) A M E N D E D JUDGMENT AGAINST DEFENDANT C-ONE TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION (J F E X 2 ) **E-Filed 6/28/2010** IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION ACTICON TECHNOLOGIES LLC, Plaintiff, v. PRETEC ELECTRONICS CORPORATION, a dissolved California corporation; PTI GLOBAL, INC.; C-ONE TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, a foreign corporation; CHIU FENG CHEN, an individual; ROBERT WU, an individual; GRACE YU, an individual; KUEI LU, an individual; and DOES 1 through 20, Defendants. Case Number CV 07-04507 JF (HRL) AMENDED JUDGMENT AGAINST C-ONE TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 AMENDED JUDGMENT IS HEREBY ENTERED for Plaintiff Acticon Technologies LLC and against Defendant C-One Technologies Corporation in the principal sum of $78,307.56, prejudgment interest of $19,1138.04, and attorney's fees of $28,139.10. DATED: 6/28/2010 __________________________________ JEREMY FOGEL United States District Judge 2 C a s e Number 07-04507 JF (HRL) A M E N D E D JUDGMENT AGAINST DEFENDANT C-ONE TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION (J F E X 2 )

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?