Moshogiannis v. USProtect Corporation

Filing 29

ORDER BY JUDGE JEREMY FOGEL VACATING 22 DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS WITHOUT PREJUDICE. (jflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/30/2008)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 C a s e No. C 07-5128 JF (HRL) O R D E R VACATING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS ( JF L C 2 ) **E-Filed 9/30/08** IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION KONSTANTINOS MOSHOGIANNIS, Plaintiff, v. USPROTECT CORPORATION, Defendant. Case Number C 07-5128 JF (HRL) ORDER VACATING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS WITHOUT PREJUDICE [re docket no. 22 ] On March 14, 2008, the Court heard argument with respect to the motion to dismiss brought by Defendant USProtect Corporation ("USProtect"). On March 19, 2008, USProtect filed notice that it was the subject of an involuntary bankruptcy petition and thus that this action was subject to an automatic stay under the Bankruptcy Code. There have been no further filings since that time. Accordingly, the Court HEREBY VACATES the pending motion to dismiss without prejudice to resubmission of the motion if and when USProtect notifies the Court that the automatic stay has been lifted. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: 9/30/08 __________________________________ JEREMY FOGEL United States District Judge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Copies of Order served on: Steven R. Blackburn sblackburn@ebglaw.com, dygarrett@ebglaw.com Hal Davis Cunningham hcunningham@scott-scott.com Matthew A Goodin mgoodin@ebglaw.com, bphillips@ebglaw.com Alan Dale Harris law@harrisandruble.com, atreanor@harrisandruble.com, dzelenski@harrisandruble.com Judy Scolnick jscolnick@scott-scott.com Arthur L. Shingler , III ashingler@scott-scott.com, ssawyer@scott-scott.com 2 C a s e No. C 07-5128 JF (HRL) O R D E R VACATING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS ( JF L C 2 )

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?