London v. Sears, Roebuck & Company

Filing 134

STIPULATION AND ORDER Dismissing Third Cause of Action with Prejudice re 132 Stipulation. Signed by Judge James Ware on 8/9/2010. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/10/2010)

UNIT ED

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Attorneys for Plaintiff CONSTANCE LONDON

ER

N

F D IS T IC T O R

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
WHEREAS

CONSTANCE LONDON, Plaintiff, v. SEARS, ROEBUCK AND COMPANY, an Illinois Corporation, and DOES I THROUGH XX, inclusive, Defendant (s).

Case No. C 07-05148 JW STIPULATED DISMISSAL OF THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE

the parties to this action have fully and finally resolved all issues relating to
HEREBY

Plaintiff's third cause of action for recovery of unpaid wages in the Complaint, IT IS
STIPULATED by

and between the parties to the action that Plaintiff's claim for recovery of unpaid

wages be, and hereby is, dismissed with prejudice as to Defendant pursuant to Fed. R. C. P. 41(0(1). Plaintiff reserves her right to appeal the Judgment to be entered. //

SIMULATED DISMISSAL OF THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION

A

C

8/9/2010

LI

FO

JOHN E. HILL (Bar No. 45338) MICHAEL P. GUTA (Bar No. 121509) LAW OFFICES OF JOHN E. HILL 8105 Edgewater Drive, Suite 100 Oakland, CA 94621 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone]

S

S DISTRICT TE C TA

mes Wa Judge Ja

re

R NIA

OO IT IS S

RDERE

D

RT U O

NO

RT

H

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED by and between that each party shall bear its own attorne and costs of suit.

DATED: 7/

/()

LAW OFFICES OF JO . HILL

By: MICHAEL P. GUTA Attorney for Plaintiff

DATED: 11 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

V1)0
By: LITTL NDELSON Attorneys for Defendant

IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: August 9, 2010 ________________________________________ United States District Judge