London v. Sears, Roebuck & Company

Filing 134

STIPULATION AND ORDER Dismissing Third Cause of Action with Prejudice re 132 Stipulation. Signed by Judge James Ware on 8/9/2010. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/10/2010)

Download PDF
UNIT ED 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Attorneys for Plaintiff CONSTANCE LONDON ER N F D IS T IC T O R UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 WHEREAS CONSTANCE LONDON, Plaintiff, v. SEARS, ROEBUCK AND COMPANY, an Illinois Corporation, and DOES I THROUGH XX, inclusive, Defendant (s). Case No. C 07-05148 JW STIPULATED DISMISSAL OF THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE the parties to this action have fully and finally resolved all issues relating to HEREBY Plaintiff's third cause of action for recovery of unpaid wages in the Complaint, IT IS STIPULATED by and between the parties to the action that Plaintiff's claim for recovery of unpaid wages be, and hereby is, dismissed with prejudice as to Defendant pursuant to Fed. R. C. P. 41(0(1). Plaintiff reserves her right to appeal the Judgment to be entered. // SIMULATED DISMISSAL OF THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION A C 8/9/2010 LI FO JOHN E. HILL (Bar No. 45338) MICHAEL P. GUTA (Bar No. 121509) LAW OFFICES OF JOHN E. HILL 8105 Edgewater Drive, Suite 100 Oakland, CA 94621 Telephone: (510) 588-1000 Facsimile: (510) 729-6333 S S DISTRICT TE C TA mes Wa Judge Ja re R NIA OO IT IS S RDERE D RT U O NO RT H 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED by and between that each party shall bear its own attorne and costs of suit. DATED: 7/ /() LAW OFFICES OF JO . HILL By: MICHAEL P. GUTA Attorney for Plaintiff DATED: 11 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 V1)0 By: LITTL NDELSON Attorneys for Defendant IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: August 9, 2010 ________________________________________ United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?