Holman et al v. Apple, Inc. et al

Filing 14

STIPULATION to Extend Time for Defendant Apple Inc. and Defendant AT&T Mobility, LLC to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiffs' 1 Complaint by Apple, Inc.. (Yates, Christopher) (Filed on 10/31/2007) Modified text on 11/1/2007 (cv, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
Holman et al v. Apple, Inc. et al Doc. 14 Case 5:07-cv-05152-JW Document 14 Filed 10/31/2007 Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ATTO R N E Y S AT LAW SA N F R A N C I S C O LATHAM & WATKINS LLP Daniel M. Wall (Bar No. 102580) Alfred C. Pfeiffer, Jr. (Bar No. 120965) Christopher S. Yates (Bar No. 161273) Adrian F. Davis (Bar No. 215827) 505 Montgomery Street, Suite 2000 San Francisco, California 94111-6538 Telephone: (415) 391-0600 Facsimile: (415) 395-8095 Email: Dan.Wall@lw.com Email: Al.Pfeiffer@lw.com Email: Chris.Yates@lw.com Email: Adrian.Davis@lw.com Attorneys for Defendant APPLE INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION PAUL HOLMAN and LUCY RIVELLO, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. APPLE, INC., AT&T MOBILITY, LLC, and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, Defendants. CASE NO. C 07-05152 JW STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT APPLE INC. AND DEFENDANT AT&T MOBILITY, LLC TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS' COMPLAINT STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT CASE NUMBER: C 07-05152 JW Dockets.Justia.com Case 5:07-cv-05152-JW Document 14 Filed 10/31/2007 Page 2 of 3 1 IT is HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Plaintiffs Paul 2 Holman and Lucy Rivello and Defendants Apple Inc. ("Apple") and AT&T Mobilty LLC 3 ("AT&T"), through their respective counsel that, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-1 (a), the time in 4 which Apple and AT&T may move, answer, or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs' Complaint, 5 which was fied on October 5, 2007 (see Docket Item #1), is extended to December 7, 2007. 6 IT is FURTHER STIPULATED that if Apple and/or AT&T respond to the 7 Complaint through a motion, the parties agree that plaintiffs' opposition to the motion shall be 8 fied on January 10, 2008, that defendants' reply brief shall be filed on January 21, 2008, and that 9 any such motions shall be set for hearing on Februar 4, 2008 or another date thereafter that the 10 Court is available. 11 These changes wil not alter the date of any event or any deadline already fixed by Respectfully submitted, FOLKENFLIK & McGERITY By Max F enflik Attorneys for Plaintiffs PAUL HOLMA and LUCY Respectfully submitted, CROWELL & MORIG LLP BY~~¿'4 :an - s;'. - . Attorneys for Defendant AT&T MOBILITY LLC LATHAM"WATKINSL" ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAN FRANCISCO STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT CASE NUBER: C 07 -05152 JW Case 5:07-cv-05152-JW Document 14 Filed 10/31/2007 Page 3 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ATTO R N E Y S AT LAW SA N F R A N C I S C O Dated: October 31, 2007 Respectfully submitted, LATHAM & WATKINS LLP By /s/ Christopher S. Yates Christopher S. Yates Attorneys for Defendant APPLE INC. SF\631281 2 STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT CASE NUMBER: C 07-05152 JW

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?