Holman et al v. Apple, Inc. et al
ORDER SHORTENING TIME re 213 Motion to Shorten Time, Signed by Judge Seeborg on 11/20/2009 (rslc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/20/2009)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
IN RE APPLE & AT&TM ANTITRUST LITIGATION.,
Master File No. C 07-05152 JW (RS) ORDER SHORTENING TIME
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: November 20, 2009 ____________________________________/
Upon consideration of plaintiffs' motion under Civil Local Rule 6-3 and defendant's opposition thereto, and taking into consideration the Court's own scheduling needs, good cause appears for plaintiffs' motion to compel to be briefed and heard as follows: November 18, 2009 December 1, 2009 December 7, 2009, 1:00 p.m. December 14, 2009, 4:00 p.m. Motion filed. Opposition due. Reply due. Hearing.
The parties are directed to continue engaging in the meet and confer process, including consultations with such engineering personal as may be useful for furthering that process, in an effort to resolve or narrow the issues presented in the motion to compel.
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?