Holman et al v. Apple, Inc. et al

Filing 31

Holman et al v. Apple, Inc. et al

Doc. 31 Att. 4

Case 5:07-cv-05152-JW

Document 31-5

Filed 11/16/2007

Page 1 of 4

EXHIBIT D

Dockets.Justia.com

Case 5:07-cv-05152-JW

ase 5:07-cv-05662-RMW Document 10 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 1 of 3

Document 31-5

Filed 11/16/2007

Page 2 of 4

1 LATHA & W A TKlS LLP
Daniel M. Wall (Bar No. 102580)
2 Alfred C. Pfeiffer, Jr. (Bar No. 120965)

Chrstopher S. Yates (Bar No. 161273)
3 Adran F. Davis (BarNo. 215827)

505 Montgomery Street, Suite 2000
4 San Francisco, Californa 94111-6538

Telephone: [phone]
5 Facsimile: [phone]

Email: Dan.Wall(qlw.com 6 Email: Ai.Pfeiffer~lw.com Email: Chrs.Yates~lw.com 7 Email: Adrian.Davislqlw.com
8 Attorneys for Defendant

APPLE INC.
9
10
11

UNTED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNA

12
13

SAN JOSE DNISION
TIMOTHY P. SMITH; MICHAEL G. LEE;
CASE NO. 07-CV-05662-RMW (PVT)

14 DENNS V. MACASADDU; MAR G.

MORIWA; and VICENT SCOTTI, on

15 behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated,
16

Plaintiffs,
v.

STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT APPLE INC. AN DEFENDANT AT&T MOBILITY LLC TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS' COMPLAINT

17
18

APPLE INC.; AT&T MOBILITY LLC; and 19 DOES ONE through ONE HUDRED, inclusive 20 Defendants.
21

22
23

24
25

26
27
28
LATHAM&WATKINS'"
ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAN FRANCISCO

STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT CASE NUMBER: 07-CV-05662- RMW (PVT)

Case 5:07-cv-05152-JW

ase 5:07-cv-05662-RMW Document 10 Filed 11/09/2007 Page 20f 3

Document 31-5

Filed 11/16/2007

Page 3 of 4

1

IT is HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Plaintiffs

2 Timothy P. Smith, Michael G. Lee, Dennis V. Macasaddu, Mark G. Morikawa and Vincent
3 Scotti and Defendants Apple Inc. ("Apple") and AT&T Mobilty LLC ("A TTM"), through their

4 respective counsel that, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-1 (a), the time in which Apple and AT&T
5 may move, answer, or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint, which was
6 filed in state cour on November 2, 2007 (the action was removed to this Court on November 7,

7 2007) (see Docket Item #1), is extended to and including December 21,2007.

8

IT is FURTHER STIPULATED that if Apple anelor A TIM respond to the

9 Complaint though a motion, the parties agree that plaintiffs' opposition to the motion shall be
10 fied on Januar 31, 2008, that defendants' reply brief(s) shall be fied on February 11,2008, and
1 i that any such motions shall be set for hearng on February 25, 2008 or another date thereafter

12 that the Court is available.
13

These changes wil not alter the date of any event or any deadline already fixed by

14 Cour Order.
15

IT is SO STIPULATED.

16
17 18

Dated: November ~ 2007

Respectflly submitted,

19

20
21

BY~~I2.~
Dated: November ~ 2007
Respectfully submitted,

LAW OFFICE OF DAMIAN R. FERNANDEZ

Damian R. Fernandez ()

22
23

Attorneys for Plaintiffs TIMOTH P. SMITH, MICHAEL G. LEE, DENNS V. MACASADDU, MARK G. MORIKAWA and VINCENT SCOTTI

24
25

CROWELL & MO~

26
27

BDarn.J FJJ ~..~ y el Sasse
Attorneys for Defendant AT&T MOBILITY LLC
STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT CASE NUMBER: 07-CV-05662-RMW (PVT
1

28
LA THAMoWATKI NS...
AUO.HI." AI LAw
SA" FRANCIICO

Case 5:07-cv-05152-JW

Document 31-5

ase 5:07-cv-05662-RMW Document 10

Filed 11/09/2007 Page 3 of 3

Filed 11/16/2007

Page 4 of 4

1 Dated: November 9, 2007

Respectfully submitted,

2
3

LATHA & W A TKlS LLP

4
5

By /s/ Chrstopher S. Yates
Chrstopher S. Yates Attorneys for Defendant
APPLE INC.

6 7
8
SF\631389

9 10
11

12
13

14
15

16
17 18

19

20
21

22
23

24
25

26 27
28
LATHAM&WATKI NS'"
ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAN FRANCISCO

2

STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT CASE NUBER: 07-CV-05662-RMW (PVT)