Holman et al v. Apple, Inc. et al

Filing 42

STIPULATION AND ORDER to Enlarge Time for Plaintiff to File a Consolidated Amended Complaint re 40 Stipulation filed by Timothy P. Smith. Plaintiff shall file the Consolidated Amended Complaint by 1/18/2008. Signed by Judge James Ware on 1/2/2008. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/2/2008) Modified docket text re clerical error on 1/15/2008 (ecg, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
Holman et al v. Apple, Inc. et al Doc. 42 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 M. Van Smith (CA Bar No. 32007) Damian R. Fernandez (CA Bar No. 206662) LAW OFFICE OF DAMIAN R. FERNANDEZ 14510 Big Basin Way, Suite A, PMB 285 Saratoga, California 95070-6091 Telephone: (408) 355-3021 Facsimile: (408) 904-7391 Email: mvsmith@sbcglobal.net damianfernandez@gmail.com Max Folkenflik (pro hac vice) FOLKENFLIK & McGERITY 1500 Broadway, 21st Floor New York, NY 10036 Telephone: (212) 757-0400 Facsimile: (212) 757-2010 Email: max@fmlaw.net Co-Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs and the Proposed Classes [Additional counsel on signature page] UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ­ SAN JOSE DIVISION NO. C 07-05152 JW STIPULATION ENLARGING TIME FOR PLAINTIFFS TO FILE A CONSOLIDATED AMENDED COMPLAINT (CIVIL LOCAL RULES 6-1, 6-2, 7-12) Judge: Honorable James Ware Action Filed: 10/05/2007 CMC: 01/28/2008 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Plaintiffs and Defendants, through their respective counsel: 1. The due date for the Consolidated Amended Complaint shall be extended from In Re Apple & AT&TM Anti-Trust Litigation December 30, 2007 to January 18, 2008. ­1­ STIPULATION ENLARGING TIME TO FILE CONSOLIDATED COMPLAINT C 07-05152-JW Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 /// 2. The due date for the Answer or briefing schedule shall be as follows: Due Date February 25, 2008 March 28, 2008 April 11, 2008 Pleading Answer or Motion Opposition Briefs Reply Briefs 3. As required by Civil Local Rule 6-2(a), counsel for plaintiffs are concurrently filing a declaration in support of this Stipulation. IT IS SO STIPULATED: Dated: December 22, 2007 Respectfully submitted, LAW OFFICE OF DAMIAN R. FERNANDEZ By: /s/ Damian R. Fernandez M. Van Smith Damian R. Fernandez LAW OFFICE OF JOSEPH ANTONELLI Joseph Antonelli (CA Bar No. 137039) Janelle C. Carney (CA Bar No. 201570) LAW OFFICES OF KEVIN T. BARNES Kevin T. Barnes (CA Bar No. 138477) Gregg Lander (CA Bar No. 194018) Plaintiffs' Co-Lead Counsel Dated: December 22, 2007 FOLKENFLIK & McGERITY By: /s/ Max Folkenflik Max Folkenflik, Esq. Margaret Folkenflik, Esq. HOFFMAN & LAZEAR H. Tim Hoffman (CA Bar No. 49141) Arthur W. Lazear (CA Bar No. 83603) Plaintiffs' Co-Lead Counsel ­2­ STIPULATION ENLARGING TIME TO FILE CONSOLIDATED COMPLAINT C 07-05152-JW 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: December 23, 2007 Respectfully submitted, CROWELL & MORING LLP By: /s/ Daniel Sasse Daniel Sasse Attorneys for Defendant AT&T MOBILITY LLC Respectfully submitted, LATHAM & WATKINS LLP By: /s/ Christopher S. Yates Christopher S. Yates Attorneys for Defendant APPLE INC. Dated: December 26, 2007 ELECTRONIC CASE FILING ATTESTATION (General Order No. 45(X)(b)) I, Damian R. Fernandez, attest that concurrence in the fling of this document has been obtained from each of the other signatories. Dated: December 26, 2007 LAW OFFICE OF DAMIAN R. FERNANDEZ By: /s/ Damian R. Fernandez Damian R. Fernandez PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. January 2, 2008 Dated: ______________________ _____________________________________ HON. JAMES WARE United States District Judge /// /// ­3­ STIPULATION ENLARGING TIME TO FILE CONSOLIDATED COMPLAINT C 07-05152-JW 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 /// CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I am over the age of 18 years, an active member of the State Bar of California, and not a party to this cause. My business address is Law Office of Damian R. Fernandez, 14510 Big Basin Way, Suite A, PMB 285, Saratoga, California 95070-6091. On December 26, 2007, I served the document(s) described as: STIPULATION ENLARGING TIME FOR PLAINTIFFS TO FILE A CONSOLIDATED AMENDED COMPLAINT to the parties listed below and in the following manner described preceding each list of recipients: BY NOTICE OF ELECTRONIC FILING The following persons were served electronically by simultaneously filing the attached document(s) with the United States District Court, Northern District of California, Case No. 0705152-JW: Attorneys for Apple Adrian Frank Davis adrian.davis@lw.com Alfred Carroll Pfeiffer, Jr. Al.Pfeiffer@lw.com Daniel Murray Wall dan.wall@lw.com Christopher S. Yates chris.yates@lw.com Attorneys For AT&T Mobility David Eldon Crowe dcrowe@crowell.com Donald M. Falk dfalk@mayerbrown.com Jeffrey H. Howard jhoward@crowell.com Christopher E. Ondeck condeck@crowell.com Daniel Allen Sasse dsasse@crowell.com Wm. Randolph Smith wrsmith@crowell.com Co-Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs Max Folkenflik max@fmlaw.net H. Tim Hoffman hth@hoffmanandlazear.com Arthur William Lazear awl@hoffmanandlazear.com Morgan Matthew Mack mmm@hoffmanandlazear.com Alfred C. Pfeiffer, Jr. al.pfeiffer@lw.com BY ELECTRONIC EMAIL The following persons were served by regular electronic mail because they have not registered for Electronic Case Filing with this Court: Co-Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs Margaret McGerity Attorneys For AT&T Mobility Archis A. Parasharami mmcgerity@fmlaw.net aparasharami@mayerbrown.com ­4­ STIPULATION ENLARGING TIME TO FILE CONSOLIDATED COMPLAINT C 07-05152-JW 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 /// /// /// /// /// /// /// /// /// /// /// /// /// /// /// /// /// /// /// /// /// /// /// /// BY U.S. MAIL I enclosed the above-described document(s) in a sealed envelope or package addressed as set forth below and delivered such document(s) to the United States Postal Service on the same day with postage thereon fully prepaid: ­5­ STIPULATION ENLARGING TIME TO FILE CONSOLIDATED COMPLAINT C 07-05152-JW

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?