Holman et al v. Apple, Inc. et al

Filing 46

***DOCUMENT FILED IN ERROR - PLEASE DISREGARD*** ADR Clerks Notice re: Non-Compliance with Court Order. (tjs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/9/2008) Modified on 1/9/2008 (tjs, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
Holman et al v. Apple, Inc. et al Doc. 46 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Northern District of California UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Northern District of California Holman, Plaintiff(s), v. Apple, Inc., Defendant(s). 07-05152 JW NOTICE RE: NONCOMPLIANCE WITH COURT ORDER United States District Court 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 The parties have failed to file an ADR Certification and either a Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Selecting an ADR Process or a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference as required by the Initial Case Management Scheduling Order. Counsel shall Meet and Confer forthwith in an attempt to agree on an ADR process for this matter. Thereafter, counsel, on behalf of themselves and each party, promptly shall file an ADR Certification and either 1) a Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Selecting ADR Process, or 2) a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference (Civil L.R. 16-8(b), ADR L. R. 3-5(b) Civil L.R. 16-8(c), ADR L. R. 3-5(c), (d)). (These forms are available at www.adr.cand.uscourts.gov.) Further, in accordance with ADR L.R. 3-5(e) counsel shall concurrently provide a copy of all documents filed pursuant to this notice directly to the ADR Unit either by fax (415-522-4112), hand delivery (ADR Program, USDC, Northern District of California, Notice Re: Noncompliance With Court Order 07-05152 JW -1Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Northern District of California 450 Golden Gate Avenue, 16th Floor, San Francisco, California), or by PDF attachment to an e-mail directed to adr@cand.uscourts.gov. It is the responsibility of counsel to schedule an ADR Phone Conference, if required, to occur before the Case Management Conference. Dated: January 9, 2008 RICHARD W. WIEKING Clerk by: Timothy J. Smagacz United States District Court 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Notice Re: Noncompliance With Court Order 07-05152 JW -2ADR Administrative Assistant 415-522-4205 Tim_Smagacz@cand.uscourts.gov PROOF OF SERVICE Case Name: Case Number: Holman v. Apple, Inc. 07-05152 JW I declare that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. I am over the age of eighteen (18) years and not a party to the action. My business address is: ADR Program United States District Court Norther District of California 450 Golden Gate Avenue Floor 16 San Francisco, CA 94102 On January 9, 2008, I served a true and correct copy of: Notice Re: Noncompliance With Court Order [X] electronically, I caused said documents to be transmitted using ECF as specified by General Order No. 45 to the following parties: Max Folkenflik Folkenflik & McGerity 1500 Broadway, 21st Floor New York, NY 10036 max@fmlaw.net Morgan Matthew Mack Hoffman & Lazear 180 Grand Avenue Suite 1550 Oakland, CA 94612 mmm@hoffmanandlazear.com H. Tim Hoffman Hoffman & Lazear 180 Grand Avenue, Suite 1550 Oakland, CA 94612 hth@hoffmanandlazear.com Margaret McGerity Folkenflik & McGerity 1500 Broadway, 21st Floor New York, NY 10036 Arthur William Lazear Hoffman & Lazear 180 Grand Avenue, Suite 1550 Oakland, CA 94612 awl@hoffmanandlazear.com Christopher S. Yates LATHAM & WATKINS LLP 505 Montgomery Street, Suite 2000 San Francisco, CA 94111-2562 chris.yates@lw.com Daniel Murray Wall Latham & Watkins LLP 505 Montgomery Street, Suite 1900 San Francisco, CA 94111 dan.wall@lw.com Alfred Carroll Pfeiffer Jr. Latham & Watkins LLP 505 Montgomery Street Suite 2000 San Francisco, CA 94111-4067 Al.Pfeiffer@lw.com Adrian Frank Davis Latham & Watkins, LLP 505 Montgomery St., Suite 1900 San Francisco, CA 94111 adrian.davis@lw.com Daniel Allen Sasse Crowell & Moring LLP 3 Park Plaza 20th Floor Irvine, CA 92614 dsasse@crowell.com Wm. Randolph Smith Crowell & Moring LLP 1001 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, DC 20004-2595 wrsmith@crowell.com Archis Ashok Parasharami Mayer Brown LLP 1909 K Street NW Washington, DC 20006 aparasharami@mayerbrown.com Jeffrey H. Howard Crowell & Moring LLP 1001 Pennsyvlania Avenue, N.W. Washington, DC 20004-2595 jhoward@crowell.com Christopher E Ondeck Crowell & Moring LLP 1001 Pennysylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, DC 20004-2595 condeck@crowell.com Donald M. Falk Mayer Brown LLP Two Palo Alto Square, Suite 300 3000 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA 94306-2112 dfalk@mayerbrown.com David Eldon Crowe Crowell and Moring LLP 3 Park Plaza 20th Floor Irvine, CA 92614-8505 dcrowe@crowell.com Timothy P. Smith , Damian Rene Fernandez Law Office of Damian R. Fernandez 14510 Big Basin Way Suite A, PMB 285 Saratoga, CA 95070-6091 damianfernandez@gmail.com M. Van Smith Law Offices of M. Van Smith Law Office of Damian R. Fernandez 14510 Big Basin Way, Suite A, PMB 285 Saratoga, CA 95070-6091 mvsmith@sbcglobal.net Giuseppe Joseph Antonelli Law Office of Joseph Antonelli 1000 Lakes Drive 450 West Covina, CA 91790 jantonelli@antonellilaw.com Janelle Christine Carney Law Office of Joseph Antonelli 1000 Lakes Drive 450 West Covina, CA 91790 jcarney@antonellilaw.com Kevin Todd Barnes Law Offices of Kevin T. Barnes 5670 Wilshire Boulevard Suite 1460 Los Angeles, CA 90036-5627 Barnes@kbarnes.com Gregg Lander Law Offices of Kevin T. Barnes 5670 Wilshire Boulevard Suite 1460 Los Angeles, CA 90036-5627 Lander@kbarnes.com [ ] by Facsimile, I caused said documents to be transmitted to the following parties by fax machine: [ ] by U. S. Mail, I placed a true copy in a sealed envelope with postage fully prepaid in the United States Post Office Mail Box in San Francisco, California, addressed as follows: I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct and that this declaration was executed on January 9, 2008 in San Francisco, California. RICHARD W. WIEKING Clerk by: Timothy J. Smagacz ADR Administrative Assistant 415-522-4205 Tim_Smagacz@cand.uscourts.gov

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?