Futia v. Brelle
ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 1/8/09. (rssec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/8/2009)
THOMAS N. STEWART, III - #88128 ATTORNEY AT LAW 369 BLUE OAK LANE, 2nd FLOOR CLAYTON, CA 94517 TELEPHONE (925) 672-8452 TELEFAX (925) 673-1729 Attorneys for Rick Futia
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
RICK FUTIA, Plaintiff, v. JUANITA BRELLE, Defendant. __________________________________/
Case No. C 07-5181 RS STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL; ORDER
The parties hereto stipulate as follows: The parties have reached a full and final settlement of all issues in this action. A Settlement Agreement between the parties has been fully executed. Some parts of the Settlement Agreement are to be performed in the future. The parties shall comply with their Settlement Agreement, a copy of which is incorporated by reference as if fully set forth. The parties request the Court to retain jurisdiction for two years from the date hereof in order to enforce the terms of the Settlement Agreement under the authority of Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. Of America, 511 U.S. 375, 381-82 (1994). C 07-5181 RS 1
Although the parties are hereby dismissing this action with prejudice, they agree that the Court will retain jurisdiction over this action and the parties hereto in order to be able to enforce the terms of the Settlement Agreement. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to this action through their designated counsel that this action be and hereby is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(2), and the Court retains jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the Settlement Agreement for two years after the date hereof. Date: December 5, 2008 Date: January 7, 2009
S/Nancy M. Battel, Attorney for Defendant(s) IT IS SO ORDERED:
S/Thomas N. Stewart, III, Attorney for Plaintiff
________________________________ U.S. Magistrate Judge
C 07-5181 RS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?