Patricia Galvin v. Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company, et al

Filing 40

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE SUMMARY JUDGMENT BRIEFING AND HEARING SCHEDULE (approving 39 ). The hearing on the cross-motions for summary judgment set for 5/29/2009 is CONTINUED to 6/5/2009 10:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 5th Floor, San Jose. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 5/13/2009. (jflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/13/2009)

Download PDF
P Chan g e P Chan g e W ! O N y bu to k lic C m C lic k to bu y .c N w .d o O c u -tr a c k .c W ! w o .d o c u -tr a c k 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SCOTT KALKIN (SBN 120791) ROBOOSTOFF & KALKIN 369 Pine Street, Ste. 610 San Francisco, CA 94104 Tel: (415) 732-0282 Fax: (415) 732-0287 Attorneys for Plaintiff PATRICIA GALVIN **E-Filed 5/13/09** THOMAS M. HERLIHY (SBN 83615) JOHN C. FERRY (SBN 104411) WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ, EDELMAN & DICKER LLP 525 Market Street, 17th Floor San Francisco, CA 94105-2725 Tel.: (415) 433-0990 Fax: (415) 434-1370 Email: herlihy@wilsonelser.com Attorneys for Defendants PROVIDENT LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY and GROUP LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN for HELLER, ERHMAN, WHITE & MCAULIFFE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) Plaint iff, ) ) vs. ) ) PROVIDENT LIFE AND ACCIDENT ) INSURANCE COMPANY as Administrator ) and Fiduciary of the GROUP LONG TERM ) DISABILITY PLAN for HELLER, ERHMAN, ) ) WHITE & MCAULIFFE, and the GROUP ) LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN for ) HELLER, ERHMAN, WHITE & ) MCAULIFFE, ) ) Defendant. ) ) PATRICIA GALVIN Case No.: C07-05195 JF STIPULATION RE SUMMARY JUDGMENT BRIEFING AND HEARING SCHEDULE; ----------------- ORDER [PROPOSED] THEREON Current Opposition Filing Date: 5/15/09 Proposed Opposition Filing Date: 5/22/09 Current Hearing Date: 5/29/09 Proposed Hearing Date: 6/5/09 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND HEARING SCHEDULE 441514.1 o m w w w w P Chan g e P Chan g e ! W N O y bu to k C lic m C lic k to bu y .c N O w .d o W c u -tr a c k .c ! w o .d o c u -tr a c k 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 The parties hereto have previously filed their opening briefs in support of their respective mot ions for summary judgment. The current schedule is for their respective opposition briefs to be filed on May 15, 2009 and the hearing on these motions held on May 29, 2009. As the result of a conflict for counsel, the parties stipulate and the Court has approved the following schedule modification: 1. On May 22, 2009, the parties will file their respective opposition briefs to the cross motions for summary judgment. 2. On June 5, 2009, the Court will hear the parties' cross motions for summary judgment and otherwise conduct a bench trial in this matter. IT IS SO STIPULATED. ROBOOSTOFF & KALKIN Dated: May 12, 2009 By________/s/____________________ Scott Kalkin Attorney for Plaintiff PATRICIA GALVIN WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ, EDELMAN & DICKER LLP Dated: May 12, 2009 By________/s/_______________________ John C. Ferry Attorney for Defendants PROVIDENT LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY and GROUP LONGER TERM DISABILITY PLAN for HELLER, ERHMAN, WHITE & MCAULIFFE -1STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND HEARING DATES Case No.: C07-05195 JF 441514.1 o m w w w w P Chan g e P Chan g e W ! O N y bu to k lic C m C lic k to bu y .c N w .d o O c u -tr a c k .c W ! w o .d o c u -tr a c k 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 13 Date: May ___, 2009 2. 1. ORDER The parties' opposition briefs shall be due May 22, 2009. The trial will be held at 10:00 a.m. on June 5, 2009, at which time the Court will hear the parties' respective motions for summary judgment. _____________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE -2STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND HEARING DATES Case No.: C07-05195 JF 441514.1 o m w w w w

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?