Balarezo v. NTH Connect Telecom Inc., et al

Filing 232

ORDER Continuing the Pretrial Conference, Requiring Supplemental Pretrial Submissions, and Requiring the Parties to Show Cause Re: Imposition of Sanctions. Order to Show Cause Hearing and Pretrial Conference set for 3/13/2013 at 9:30 AM. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on February 27, 2013. (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/27/2013)

Download PDF
*E-FILED: February 27, 2013* 1 2 3 4 5 NOT FOR CITATION 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 SAN JOSE DIVISION 9 VLADIMIR BALAREZO; ET AL., Plaintiffs, For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 v. 11 NTH CONNECT TELECOM, INC. ET AL., 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Defendants. ____________________________________/ 1. for March 1, 2013 at 1:30 pm, are continued to March 13, 2013 at 9:30 am. 2. By 9:00 am March 11, 2013, the parties shall e-file (and simultaneously deliver courtesy copies to chambers) the following: a) b) exhibits, as required by paragraph C(4) of the Standing Order); c) 24 28 An estimate of trial time that actually complies with paragraph B(8)(i) of the Standing Order; d) 26 27 An exhibit list that actually complies with Paragraph B(8)(g) of the Standing Order (including, if applicable, particularized objections to opposing-party 22 25 A witness list that actually complies with paragraph B(8)(f) of the Court’s Standing Order Re: Pretrial Preparation (“Standing Order”); 21 23 ORDER CONTINUING THE PRETRIAL CONFERENCE, REQUIRING SUPPLEMENTAL PRETRIAL SUBMISSIONS, AND REQUIRING THE PARTIES TO SHOW CAUSE RE: IMPOSITION OF SANCTIONS The Pretrial Conference, and all related matters currently set or purportedly “noticed” 19 20 No. C07-05243 HRL A joint set of proposed jury instructions that actually complies with paragraph B(5) of the Standing Order; e) A “Relief Prayed” statement by plaintiffs that actually complies with paragraph B(8)(h) of the Standing Order; and f) 1 Order. 2 3 A verdict form from plaintiffs as required by paragraph B(6) of the Standing 3. By 1:00 p.m. on March 8, 2013, the parties shall submit to chambers, but not e-file: 4 a) Copies of each party’s FRCP 26(a) and 26(e) disclosures; and 5 b) In a 3-ring binder, properly numbered and tabbed, each side’s proposed 6 exhibits. Plaintiffs are allotted numbers 1-100. Defendants exhibits will begin 7 with number 101. Number each page of multi-page exhibits. 8 9 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 4. Furthermore, at the time of the Pretrial Conference, each side shall show cause why sanctions should not be imposed for the following: a) Failing to schedule, as ordered on August 8, 2012, a Settlement Conference with Judge Grewal to take place before the Pretrial Conference; 11 12 b) Failing to meet and confer as required in the Standing Order; 13 c) Failing to make the joint submissions required by the Standing Order; 14 d) Failing to address fully and responsively each requirement in the Standing Order; 15 16 17 18 e) Failing to timely deliver courtesy copies to chambers of pretrial e-filings. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 27, 2013 19 20 HOWARD R. LLOYD UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 1 C07-05243 HRL Notice will be electronically mailed to: 2 Adam Wang,,, 3 4 Brad Yamauchi,,,, 5 Glicel E Sumagaysay 6 Kevin Robert Allen 7 Tomas Eduardo Margain,,,, 8 9 Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel who have not registered for e-filing under the court’s CM/ECF program. For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?