Balarezo v. NTH Connect Telecom Inc., et al

Filing 232

ORDER Continuing the Pretrial Conference, Requiring Supplemental Pretrial Submissions, and Requiring the Parties to Show Cause Re: Imposition of Sanctions. Order to Show Cause Hearing and Pretrial Conference set for 3/13/2013 at 9:30 AM. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on February 27, 2013. (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/27/2013)

*E-FILED: February 27, 2013*

1
2
3
4
5

NOT FOR CITATION

6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8

SAN JOSE DIVISION

9

VLADIMIR BALAREZO; ET AL.,
Plaintiffs,

For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10
v.
11

NTH CONNECT TELECOM, INC. ET AL.,
12
13
14
15
16
17
18

Defendants.
____________________________________/
1.

for March 1, 2013 at 1:30 pm, are continued to March 13, 2013 at 9:30 am.
2.

By 9:00 am March 11, 2013, the parties shall e-file (and simultaneously deliver

courtesy copies to chambers) the following:
a)

b)

exhibits, as required by paragraph C(4) of the Standing Order);
c)

24

28

An estimate of trial time that actually complies with paragraph B(8)(i) of the
Standing Order;

d)

26
27

An exhibit list that actually complies with Paragraph B(8)(g) of the Standing
Order (including, if applicable, particularized objections to opposing-party

22

25

A witness list that actually complies with paragraph B(8)(f) of the Court’s
Standing Order Re: Pretrial Preparation (“Standing Order”);

21

23

ORDER CONTINUING THE
PRETRIAL CONFERENCE,
REQUIRING SUPPLEMENTAL
PRETRIAL SUBMISSIONS, AND
REQUIRING THE PARTIES TO
SHOW CAUSE RE: IMPOSITION OF
SANCTIONS

The Pretrial Conference, and all related matters currently set or purportedly “noticed”

19
20

No. C07-05243 HRL

A joint set of proposed jury instructions that actually complies with paragraph
B(5) of the Standing Order;

e)

A “Relief Prayed” statement by plaintiffs that actually complies with
paragraph B(8)(h) of the Standing Order; and

f)

1

Order.

2
3

A verdict form from plaintiffs as required by paragraph B(6) of the Standing

3.

By 1:00 p.m. on March 8, 2013, the parties shall submit to chambers, but not e-file:

4

a)

Copies of each party’s FRCP 26(a) and 26(e) disclosures; and

5

b)

In a 3-ring binder, properly numbered and tabbed, each side’s proposed

6

exhibits. Plaintiffs are allotted numbers 1-100. Defendants exhibits will begin

7

with number 101. Number each page of multi-page exhibits.

8
9

For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

4.

Furthermore, at the time of the Pretrial Conference, each side shall show cause why
sanctions should not be imposed for the following:
a)

Failing to schedule, as ordered on August 8, 2012, a Settlement Conference
with Judge Grewal to take place before the Pretrial Conference;

11
12

b)

Failing to meet and confer as required in the Standing Order;

13

c)

Failing to make the joint submissions required by the Standing Order;

14

d)

Failing to address fully and responsively each requirement in the Standing
Order;

15
16
17
18

e)

Failing to timely deliver courtesy copies to chambers of pretrial e-filings.

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: February 27, 2013

19
20

HOWARD R. LLOYD
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2

1

C07-05243 HRL Notice will be electronically mailed to:

2

Adam Wang [e-mail], [e-mail], [e-mail],
[e-mail]

3
4

Brad Yamauchi [e-mail], [e-mail],
[e-mail], [e-mail], [e-mail]

5

Glicel E Sumagaysay

6

Kevin Robert Allen

7

Tomas Eduardo Margain [e-mail], [e-mail],
[e-mail], [e-mail], [e-mail]

[e-mail]
[e-mail]

8
9

Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel who have not
registered for e-filing under the court’s CM/ECF program.

For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

3