Rufelas et al v. Bhullar et al

Filing 34

STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING CASE with prejudice. Court to retain jurisdiction to enforce settlement agreement. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 11/4/2008. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/4/2008)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25

ADAM WANG, Bar No. 201233 LAW OFFICES OF ADAM WANG 12 South First Street, Suite 708 San Jose, CA 95113 Tel: [phone] Fax: [phone] [e-mail] Attorneys for Plaintiffs

*ORDER E-FILED 11/4/2008*

LAW OFFICES OF JOSEPH R. KAFKA Joseph R. Kafka, Esq. SB #139510 1541 The Alameda San Jose, California 95126 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: 408-279-0401 Attorney for Defendants Jaswinder & Mangal Bhullar
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA RODOLFO F RUFELAS & EVA ROMERO GARCIA Plaintiffs, vs. Case No.: C07-5244 HRL STIPULATION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE & ORDER THEREON

JASWINDER BHULLAR, MANGAL S BHULLAR, JOHNNY NGUYEN, & DOES 1 THOUGHT 10 Defendants Plaintiffs and Defendants, through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate as follows: 1. Parties have reached a settlement with respect to all claims of all Plaintiffs against

all Defendants in this case. 2. prejudice. As such, parties hereby stipulate to dismiss this action in its entirety with

1 STIPULATION TO DISMISS Rufelas, et al. v. Bhullar, et al.

C07-5244 HRL

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25

3.

The Parties stipulate that this Court should retain its jurisdiction over this case for

the purpose of enforcing the settlement agreement.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, Dated: November 1, 2008 By: /s/ ADAM WANG Adam Wang Attorney for Plaintiffs Dated: November 1, 2008 By: ___/s/ JOSEPH KAFKA Joseph Kafka Attorney for Defendants
______________________________________________________

[PROPOSED] XXXXXXXX ORDER Pursuant to party's stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED.

4 Dated: November _____, 2008

_________________________ Howard R. Lloyd United States Magistrate Judge

2 STIPULATION TO DISMISS Rufelas, et al. v. Bhullar, et al.

C07-5244 HRL