Applied Materials, Inc. v. Advanced Micro-Fabrication Equipment (Shanghai) Co, LTD et al

Filing 590

STIPULATION AND ORDER GRANTING Extension of Time to Object to Discovery Order No. 39 re 472 Stipulation. Signed by Judge James Ware on 10/30/2009. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/30/2009)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

UNIT ED

HAROLD J. MCELHINNY (CA SBN 66781) [e-mail] MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 425 Market Street San Francisco, CA 94105-2482 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: 415.268.7522 KENNETH A. KUWAYTI (CA SBN 145384) [e-mail] MARC DAVID PETERS (CA SBN 211725) [e-mail] PAUL F. COYNE (CA SBN 223900) [e-mail] MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 755 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, CA 94304-1018 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: 650.494.0792

S

S DISTRICT TE C TA

ER

N

D IS T IC T R

OF

Attorneys for Defendants ADVANCED MICRO-FABRICATION EQUIPMENT INC. CHINA, ADVANCED MICRO-FABRICATION EQUIPMENT, INC. ASIA, ADVANCED MICROFABRICATION EQUIPMENT INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

APPLIED MATERIALS, INC., Plaintiff, v. ADVANCED MICRO-FABRICATION EQUIPMENT, INC. CHINA, ADVANCED MICRO-FABRICATION EQUIPMENT, INC. ASIA, ADVANCED MICRO-FABRICATION EQUIPMENT INC., Defendants.

Case No.

C07 05248 JW

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO OBJECT DISCOVERY ORDER NO. 39

A

C

LI

FO

mes Wa Judge Ja

re

R NIA

O OR IT IS S

DERED

RT U O

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO OBJECT DO # 39 CASE NO. C07 05248 JW pa-1362835

NO

RT

H

1

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Whereas on September 21, 2009, the Special Master issued Discovery Order No. 39 ("DO 39"), which addressed issues related to Applied's Trade Secret 6; Whereas the deadline for objecting to DO 39 would normally be October 5, 2009; Whereas on October 1, 2009, Applied filed a motion for leave to amend Trade Secret 6 ("Applied's Motion"); Whereas the parties agree that, in the interest of judicial efficiency, any objection to DO 39 should be due at the same time as an objection to the order that will issue on Applied's Motion; and Whereas the Special Master agrees with this approach (see October 1, 2009 email correspondence from Special Master to parties); THEREFORE, the Parties hereby STIPULATE as follows: Objections to Discovery Order No 39 will not be due until ten days after the issuance of a Discovery Order on Applied's Motion for Leave to Amend Trade Secret 6. Dated: October 2, 2009 HAROLD J. MCELHINNY KENNETH A. KUWAYTI MARC DAVID PETERS PAUL F. COYNE MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP By: /s/ PAUL F. COYNE Paul F. Coyne

Attorneys for Defendants ADVANCED MICRO-FABRICATION EQUIPMENT, INC. CHINA, ADVANCED MICRO-FABRICATION EQUIPMENT, INC. ASIA, and ADVANCED MICRO-FABRICATION EQUIPMENT INC.

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO OBJECT DO # 39 CASE NO. C07 05248 JW pa-1362835

2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Dated: October 2, 2009

THOMAS F. FITZPATRICK JOHN C. ENGLANDER JAMES C. REHNQUIST MICHAEL G. STRAPP GOODWIN PROCTER LLP By: /s/ MICHAEL G. STRAPP Michael G. Strapp

Attorneys for Plaintiff APPLIED MATERIALS, INC.

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO OBJECT DO # 39 CASE NO. C07 05248 JW pa-1362835

3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: It is so ordered.

ORDER

October 30, 2009

Honorable James Ware United States District Judge Northern District of California

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO OBJECT DO # 39 CASE NO. C07 05248 JW pa-1362835

4