Concetti v. Impac Funding Corporation et al

Filing 49

STIPULATION AND ORDER for Dismissal with Prejudice of Complaint as to Defendant Impac Funding Corporation [FRCP 41(a)(1)] re 48 Stipulation. Signed by Judge James Ware on 12/12/2008. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/12/2008)

Download PDF
1 Eric M. Schiffer, Esq. (SBN 179695) emschiffer@wolfewyman.com 2 Eric T. Lamhofer, Esq. (SBN 115865) etlamhofer@wolfewyman.com 3 WOLFE & WYMAN LLP 5 Park Plaza, Suite 1100 4 Irvine, California 92614-5979 Telephone: (949) 475-9200 5 Facsimile: (949) 475-9203 6 Attorneys for Defendant/Cross-Claimant IMPAC FUNDING CORPORATION 7 dba IMPAC LENDING GROUP 8 9 10 11 WOLFE & WYMAN LLP Attorneys & Counselors At Law UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA DOMINIC CONCETTI by his Guardian Ad Litem, , SHARON FRASER, Plaintiff, v. IMPAC FUNDING CORPORATION, a California corporation, dba IMPAC; UNIVERSAL MORTGAGE AND SALES, INC., a California corporation; RAYMOND FLORES, an individual; and ERIK S. GONZALES, an individual, Defendants. IMPAC FUNDING CORPORATION dba IMPAC LENDING GROUP, Cross-Claimant, v. UNIVERSAL SALES & MORTGAGE, INC., RAYMOND FLORES, an individual, ERIK S. GONZALES, an individual; Cross-Defendants. Case No. C07-05410 JW [PROPOSED] ORDER ON STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF COMPLAINT AS TO DEFENDANT IMPAC FUNDING CORPORATION [FRCP 41(a)(1)] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 /// 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER RE STIPULATION C07-05410-JW 1 The Court having reviewed the proposed stipulation of Plaintiff DOMINIC 2 CONCETTI , through his guardian ad litem, Sharon Fraser ("Plaintiff"), and 3 Defendant IMPAC FUNDING CORPORATION ("IMPAC") to dismiss Defendant 4 IMPAC from this action, pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1), and good cause appearing 5 therefor, 6 7 9 10 December 12, 2008 11 DATED: ____________________ WOLFE & WYMAN LLP Attorneys & Counselors At Law IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant IMPAC, be, and hereby is, IT IS SO ORDERED. ___________________________ Honorable James Ware United States District Court Judge 8 dismissed with prejudice from the Complaint in this action. 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 H:\Matters\Impac (1177)\065 (Rescission of Concetti)\Pleadings\[Proposed] Order re Stipulation Re Dismissal.doc [PROPOSED] ORDER RE STIPULATION C07-05410-JW

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?