Matthes v. County of Santa Cruz et al
Filing
19
ORDER RESCHEDULING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE. Settlement Conference set for 10/17/2008 09:30 AM. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 9/11/08. (rssec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/11/2008)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 CARL MATTHES, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF SANTA CRUZ, et al., Defendants. _____________________________________/ TO ALL PARTIES AND COUNSEL OF RECORD: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the settlement conference previously scheduled for September 12, 2008 in Courtroom 4, Fifth Floor, 280 South First Street, San Jose, California has been rescheduled to October 17, 2008 at 9:30 a.m. Counsel who will try the case shall appear at the settlement conference with the parties and with the person or persons having full authority to negotiate and to settle the case. Settlement conference statements, if not previously submitted, are due seven (7) days prior to the settlement conference. All other provisions of this Court's Order, dated July 8, 2008, shall remain in effect. No. C 07-05559 JF (RS) ORDER RESCHEDULING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA *E-FILED* September 11, 2008
United States District Court
12
For the Northern District of California
13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
The parties shall notify Magistrate Judge Seeborg's chambers immediately if this case settles prior to the date set for settlement conference.
Dated: September 11, 2008
RICHARD SEEBORG United States Magistrate Judge
2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT NOTICE OF THIS ORDER WAS ELECTRONICALLY PROVIDED TO Clyde A. Thompson Kate Wells cthompson@htalaw.com, ldobbins@htalaw.com
lioness@got.net
Dated: September 11, 2008
CHAMBERS OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE RICHARD SEEBORG By: /s/ BAK
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?