Jackson et al v. Silicon Valley Animal Control Authority et al

Filing 67

ORDER VACATING EARLY NEUTRAL EVALUATION CONFERENCE re 65 , 66 . Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 9/24/08. (rssec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/25/2008)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 LEE JACKSON, et. al v. Plaintiffs, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION NO. C 07-5667 RS ORDER VACATING EARLY NEUTRAL EVALUATION CONFERENCE *E-FILED 9/25/08* United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SILICON VALLEY ANIMAL CONTROL AUTHORITY, et al., Defendants. / The Court hereby grants defendants' request to vacate their September 29, 2008 Early Neutral Evaluation Conference with Christopher Johns, Esq. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September 24, 2008 RICHARD SEEBORG United States Magistrate Judge ORDER VACATING EARLY NEUTRAL EVALUATION CONFERENCE C 07-5667 RS 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT NOTICE OF THIS ORDER HAS BEEN GIVEN TO: Dirk Donald Larsen Harry C. Gilbert DLarsen@lowball.com, sgravem@lowball.com hgilbert@travelers.com, paugusta@travelers.com mhazelwood@lowball.com, dcostes@lowball.com mserverian@rllss.com stuartwilson@earthlink.net bill@southbaylaw.com Mark F. Hazelwood Michael C. Serverian Stuart McLeod Wilson William Robert Seligmann Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel who have not registered for e-filing under the Court's CM/ECF program. AND A COPY OF THIS ORDER WAS MAILED TO: Christopher Johns Johns & Allyn APC 1010 B St., Suite 350 San Rafael, CA 94901 United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: 9/25/08 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk By: Chambers ORDER VACATING EARLY NEUTRAL EVALUATION CONFERENCE C 07-5667 RS 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?