Seagate Technology, LLP v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA

Filing 175

ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE. The Court finds that it is appropriate to receive an Opposition brief from Defendant prior to ruling on Plaintiff's Objection. Accordingly, on or before August 10, 2009, Defendant shall file an Opposition to Plaintiffs Objection. Signed by Judge James Ware on August 5, 2009. (jwlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/5/2009) Modified docket text on 8/15/2009 (ecg, COURT STAFF).

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Seagate Technology, LLC, v. Plaintiff, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION NO. C 07-05700 JW ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE

United United States District Court

11
For the Northern District of California

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA, Defendant. /

Presently before the Court is Seagate's Objection to Magistrate Judge Trumbull's Order Denying Motion for Protective Order Re Deposition of Robert Freitas. (Docket Item No. 171.) The Court finds that it is appropriate to receive an Opposition brief from Defendant prior to ruling on Plaintiff's Objection. See Civ. L.R. 72-2. Accordingly, on or before August 10, 2009, Defendant shall file an Opposition to Plaintiff's Objection.

Dated: August 5, 2009

JAMES WARE United States District Judge

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT COPIES OF THIS ORDER HAVE BEEN DELIVERED TO: Daniel Justin Weinberg [e-mail] Rebecca R. Weinreich [e-mail] Robert E. Freitas [e-mail] Stephen Vincent Kovarik [e-mail] Theresa Ann Sutton [e-mail]

Dated: August 5, 2009

Richard W. Wieking, Clerk By: /s/ JW Chambers Elizabeth Garcia Courtroom Deputy

United States District Court

11
For the Northern District of California

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28