Magic Control Technology Corporation et al v. GWC Technology Inc. et al
Filing
40
STIPULATION AND ORDER 39 of Dismissal With Prejudice, ***Civil Case Terminated. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 8/12/09. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/13/2009)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
JAMES C. YOON State Bar No. 177155 (jyoon@wsgr.com) STEFANI E. SHANBERG State Bar No. 206717 (sshanberg@wsgr.com) ROBIN L. BREWER State Bar No. 253686 (rbrewer@wsgr.com) WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI Professional Corporation 650 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050 Telephone: (650) 493-9300 Facsimile: (650) 565-5100 Attorneys for Intervenor DISPLAYLINK CORPORATION and Defendants KENSINGTON COMPUTER PRODUCTS GROUP, and GWC TECHNOLOGY, INC.
JOHN D. van LOBEN SELS State Bar No. 201354 (jvanlobensels@whgclaw.com) RICHARD F. CAULEY State Bar No. 109194 (rcauley@whgclaw.com) FRANKLIN E. GIBBS State Bar No. 189015 (fgibbs@whgclaw.com) WANG, HARTMANN, GIBBS & CAULEY Professional Corporation 2570 W. El Camino Real, Suite 440 Mountain View, CA 94040 Telephone: (650) 209-1230 Facsimile: (650) 209-1231 Attorneys for Plaintiff MAGIC CONTROL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION
*E-FILED - 8/12/09*
MAGIC CONTROL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, a Taiwanese Corporation,
) ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) ) KENSINGTON COMPUTER PRODUCTS ) GROUP, a division of ACCO Brands ) Corporation, a Delaware Corporation; GWC ) TECHNOLOGY INC., a California corporation; ) GOOD WAY TECHNOLOGY CO. LTD., a ) Taiwan corporation; and GOOD WAY ) ELECTRONICS, a Washington corporation, ) ) Defendants, ) ) DISPLAYLINK CORPORATION, a Washington ) corporation, ) ) Intervenor. ) ) ) AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS ) )
CASE NO.: 5:07-CV-05707-RMW RELATED CASE NO.: 5:07-CV-01998RMW STIPULATION AND [] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
STIPULATION AND [] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE CASE NO. 07-CV-05707-RMW
3706316_1
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Plaintiff Magic Control Technology, Corporation ("MCT"), Intervenor DisplayLink Corporation ("DisplayLink") and Defendants Kensington Computer Products Group ("Kensington") and GWC Technology, Inc. ("GWC"), by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate that all claims for relief in the above identified action shall be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41 and pursuant to a confidential license agreement between DisplayLink and MCT. The Parties stipulate that each party shall be responsible for its own fees and costs.
Respectfully submitted, Dated: June 25, 2009 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI Professional Corporation
By:
/s/ Stefani E. Shanberg Stefani E. Shanberg
Attorneys for Intervenor DISPLAYLINK CORPORATION and Defendants KENSINGTON COMPUTER PRODUCTS GROUP and GWC TECHNOLOGY, INC. Dated: June 25, 2009 WANG, HARTMANN, GIBBS & CAULEY A Professional Corporation
By:
/s/ John D. van Loben Sels John D. van Loben Sels
Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff MAGIC CONTROL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
8/12/09 DATED: ______________________
____________________________ The Honorable Ronald M. Whyte
3706316_1
STIPULATION AND [] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE CASE NO. 07-CV-05707-RMW
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
STIPULATION AND [] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE CASE NO. 5:07-CV-05707-RMW
ATTESTATION CLAUSE I, Stefani E. Shanberg, am the ECF User whose identification and password are being used to file this Stipulation. In compliance with General Order 45.X.B., I hereby attest that John D. van Loben Sels of Wang, Hartmann, Gibbs & Cauley, P.L.C. has concurred in this filling
Dated: June 25, 2009
WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI Professional Corporation
By:
/s/ Stefani E. Shanberg Stefani E. Shanberg
Attorneys for Intervenor DISPLAYLINK CORPORATION and Defendants KENSINGTON COMPUTER PRODUCTS GROUP and GWC TECHNOLOGY, INC.
-2-
3706316_1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?