Mou v. City of San Jose et al

Filing 11

ADR Clerks Notice re: Non-Compliance with Court Order. (tjs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/20/2008)

Mou v. City of San Jose et al

Doc. 11

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Northern District of California Mou, Plaintiff(s), v. City of San Jose, Defendant(s). 07-05740 RS NOTICE RE: NONCOMPLIANCE WITH COURT ORDER

United States District Court

11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

The parties have failed to file an ADR Certification and either a Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Selecting an ADR Process or a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference as required by the Initial Case Management Scheduling Order. Counsel shall Meet and Confer forthwith in an attempt to agree on an ADR process for this matter. Thereafter, counsel, on behalf of themselves and each party, promptly shall file an ADR Certification and either 1) a Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Selecting ADR Process, or 2) a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference (Civil L.R. 16-8(b), ADR L. R. 3-5(b) Civil L.R. 16-8(c), ADR L. R. 3-5(c), (d)). (These forms are available at www.adr.cand.uscourts.gov.)

Further, in accordance with ADR L.R. 3-5(e) counsel shall concurrently provide a copy of all documents filed pursuant to this notice directly to the ADR Unit either by fax [phone]), hand delivery (ADR Program, USDC, Northern District of California, Notice Re: Noncompliance With Court Order 07-05740 RS -1Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Northern District of California

450 Golden Gate Avenue, 16th Floor, San Francisco, California), or by PDF attachment to an e-mail directed to [e-mail].

It is the responsibility of counsel to schedule an ADR Phone Conference, if required, to occur before the Case Management Conference.

Dated: March 20, 2008 RICHARD W. WIEKING Clerk by: Timothy J. Smagacz

United States District Court

11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Notice Re: Noncompliance With Court Order 07-05740 RS -2ADR Administrative Assistant 415-522-4205 [e-mail]

PROOF OF SERVICE Case Name: Case Number: Mou v. City of San Jose 07-05740 RS

I declare that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. I am over the age of eighteen (18) years and not a party to the action. My business address is: ADR Program United States District Court Norther District of California 450 Golden Gate Avenue Floor 16 San Francisco, CA 94102 On March 20, 2008, I served a true and correct copy of: Notice Re: Noncompliance With Court Order [X] electronically, I caused said documents to be transmitted using ECF as specified by General Order No. 45 to the following parties: Chin-Li Mou 4141 Boneso Circle San Jose, CA 95134 Robert Baker Burchfiel Office of the City Attorney 200 East Santa Clara Street San Jose, CA 95113-1905 [e-mail] San Jose Public Library Education Park Branch ,

[ ] by Facsimile, I caused said documents to be transmitted to the following parties by fax machine:

[ ] by U. S. Mail, I placed a true copy in a sealed envelope with postage fully prepaid in the United States Post Office Mail Box in San Francisco, California, addressed as follows:

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct and that this declaration was executed on March 20, 2008 in San Francisco, California. RICHARD W. WIEKING Clerk by: Timothy J. Smagacz ADR Administrative Assistant 415-522-4205 [e-mail]