Mou v. City of San Jose et al
Filing
20
ADR Clerk's Notice Appointing Carol Webster Millie as ENE Evaluator. (cmf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/20/2008)
<![CDATA[
Mou v. City of San Jose et al
Doc. 20
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Northern District of California
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Northern District of California Mou, Plaintiff(s), v. City of San Jose, Defendant(s). TO COUNSEL OF RECORD: The court notifies the parties and counsel that the Evaluator assigned to this case is: Carol Webster Millie Corporate Advisory Law Group 40 Main St. Los Altos, CA 94022 650-947-9199 cmillie@adviselaw.com Counsel shall familiarize themselves with the requirements of ADR L.R. 5 which governs the ENE program. The evaluator will schedule a joint phone conference with counsel under ADR L.R. 5-7 and will set the date of the ENE session within the deadlines set by ADR L.R. 5-5 or the court order referring this action to ENE. The court permits the evaluator to charge each party its pro rata share of the cost of the phone conference. 07-05740 JF ENE Notice of Appointment of Evaluator
United States District Court
11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Notice of Appointment of Evaluator 07-05740 JF ENE
-1Dockets.Justia.com
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Northern District of California
Counsel are reminded that the written ENE statements required by the ADR L.R. 5-8 shall NOT be filed with the court.
Dated: May 20, 2008 RICHARD W. WIEKING Clerk by: Claudia M. Forehand
ADR Case Administrator 415-522-2059 Claudia_Forehand@cand.uscourts.gov
United States District Court
11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Notice of Appointment of Evaluator 07-05740 JF ENE
-2-
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
