Mou v. City of San Jose et al

Filing 2662

Download PDF
Mou v. City of San Jose et al Doc. 2662 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California LOLITA SCHAR, Plaintiff, v. HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE, CO, Defendants. ________________________________/ No. C 02-1073 JL CORRECTION 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 There is a typographical error in this court's Summary Judgment order, filed January 23, 2003. At page 13, lines 19-22, is the following: "Plaintiff attempts to distinguish "foreseeable" from "foreseen," to show that, while Dr. Knight anticipated an embolism of some kind, making an embolism per se foreseeable, he did not anticipate a fatal embolism, so if Mr. Schar's death resulted from such an embolism it was not foreseen, and therefore not an accident." The last line should read "it was not foreseen, and therefore was an accident." The order is hereby corrected. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: January 24, 2003 __________________________________ James Larson United States Magistrate Judge C-02-1073 CORRECTION 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?