Mou v. City of San Jose et al

Filing 2662

Mou v. City of San Jose et al

Doc. 2662

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

United States District Court

11
For the Northern District of California

LOLITA SCHAR, Plaintiff, v. HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE, CO, Defendants. ________________________________/

No. C 02-1073 JL CORRECTION

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

There is a typographical error in this court's Summary Judgment order, filed January 23, 2003. At page 13, lines 19-22, is the following: "Plaintiff attempts to distinguish "foreseeable" from "foreseen," to show that, while Dr. Knight anticipated an embolism of some kind, making an embolism per se foreseeable, he did not anticipate a fatal embolism, so if Mr. Schar's death resulted from such an embolism it was not foreseen, and therefore not an accident." The last line should read "it was not foreseen, and therefore was an accident." The order is hereby corrected. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: January 24, 2003 __________________________________ James Larson United States Magistrate Judge

C-02-1073 CORRECTION

1
Dockets.Justia.com