Nygren v. Hewlett-Packard Company

Filing 65

STIPULATION AND ORDER Regarding Mediation Deadline re 62 Stipulation filed by Hewlett-Packard Company. Signed by Judge James Ware on 12/1/2008. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/1/2008)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 MICHAEL F. RAM (SBN 104805) mfr@lrolaw.com LEVY, RAM & OLSON LLP 639 Front Street, 4th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: 415-433-4949 Facsimile: 415-433-7311 MARC H. EDELSON (Pro Hac Vice) medelson@edelson-law.com EDELSON & ASSOCIATES, LLC 45 w. Court Street Doylestown, PA 18901 Telephone: 215-230-8043 Facsimile: 215-230-87335 JEFFREY L. KODROFF (Pro Hac Vice) jkodroff@srk-law.com JOHN A. MACORETTA JMacoretta@srk-law.com SPECTOR, ROSEMAN & KODROFF, P.C. 1818 Market Street, Suite 2500 Philadelphia, PA 19103 Telephone: 215-496-0300 Facsimile: 215-496-6611 Attorneys for Plaintiffs NATHAN NYGREN and STEPHEN SHIFFLETTE HOWARD HOLDERNESS (SBN 169814) hholderness@morganlewis.com MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP One Market, Spear Street Tower San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: 415.442.1000 Facsimile: 415.442.1001 ROBERT A. PARTICELLI (PAB 82651) (Pro Hac Vice) rparticelli@morganlewis.com MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP 1701 Market Street Philadelphia, PA 19103 Telephone: 215.963.5000 Facsimile: 215.963.5001 Attorneys for Defendant HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (SAN JOSE DIVISION) NATHAN NYGREN and STEPHEN SHIFFLETTE, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, Defendant. JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING MEDIATION DEADLINE BEFORE: Hon. James Ware CASE NO. 07-05793 JW (HRL) CLASS ACTION WHEREAS, on February 12, 2008, the Parties filed a Stipulation Selecting ADR Process and selected mediation; Case No. 07-05793 JW ­ JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING MEDIATION DEADLINE 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WHEREAS, pursuant to a further stipulation by the Parties, the Court entered an Order on July 1, 2008 postponing mediation until no later than 45 days after the Court's ruling on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint; WHEREAS, on October 24, 2008, the Court granted Defendant's Motion in part and denied it in part, and granted the Plaintiffs leave to filed a Second Amended Complaint; NOW, WHEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and among the Parties to the above-captioned matter, and by and between their undersigned counsel that: 1. 2. 24, 2008. 3. Defendant intends to filed a renewed Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule The current mediation deadline is December 8, 2008. Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint is due to be filed no later than November of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). 4. The Parties believe that any mediation will be more productive after a ruling on Defendant's intended Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint. Therefore, the Parties request an extension of the mediation deadline until no later than 45 days after the Court's ruling on the intended motion. 5. The filer of this document attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the other signatory. Dated: November 20, 2008 LEVY, RAM & OLSON By: s/ Michael F. Ram Michael F. Ram mfr@lrolaw.com 639 Front Street, 4th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 433-4949 Facsimile: (415) 433-7311 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Case No. 07-05793 JW ­ JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING MEDIATION DEADLINE 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: November 20, 2008 By: MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP s/ Robert A. Particelli Robert A. Particelli (Pro Hac Vice) rparticelli@morganlewis.com MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP 1701 Market Street Philadelphia, PA 19103 Telephone: 215-963-5000 Facsimile: 215-963-5001 Attorneys for Defendant Case No. 07-05793 JW ­ JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING MEDIATION DEADLINE 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER PURSUANT TO THE TERMS OF THE STIPULATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: (a) the current mediation deadline is vacated; and (b) the Mediator will hold a mediation session within 45 days of the Court's ruling on any motion to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint, if necessary. DATED: December 1, 2008 The Hon. James Ware, U.S.D.J. Case No. 07-05793 JW ­ JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING MEDIATION DEADLINE 5

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?