Everflow Technology Corporation v. Millenium Electronics, Inc.

Filing 303

STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING DEFENDANT MICHAEL CALLAGHAN. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on January 28, 2013. (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/28/2013)

I
*E-FILED: January 28, 2013*

1 RicbardJ. La Flem,.Esq, (Ca. BarNo. 129065)
LA FLEUR LAW OFFICES
.2 2033GateW!Iy Place, S'h Floor
SanJose, CA9511.0
3

4

TeL: [phone]
I

rEmail: [e-mail]

5 j Hllllll Cailaghart, Es.q, (Cal. BarNo. 164769)
1Attorney at Law

I141.0BrightQak&Cowt

6

.Los Altos, CA94024
7 · ITel. (650) 964~2594
1

8 ' Email: [e-mail]
9 Attorneys for Defendant Michael Callaghan

10

UNITED STATES )){STRICT CO(I.RT

ll

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

'
12 I

I

SAN JQSE I>IVISION

njl

1 EVEI{FLQWTECHNOLOGY

l4

!

CORPORATION', 1nCQrporated under the
laws of the RepuWic of¢1iln<! (TaiW!In),

15

STIPULATION OF Dl.SMISS;AL OF
DEFENDANT MICHAEL CALLAGHAN
BYJ?L:Al.NTIFF .EVERFLOW . . .
'tECHNOLOGY CORPORATION

Plaintiff,

Hi

!

I
'
i

17 v.
llf f MlLLENIUM ELECTRONICS, INC., a
/·.Califo~~.cotporation;etal,

19

I

20j

2:1122 .

ANDEELATED CROSSACTIONS.

24 !
IT l.S ~$¥ .STll'DLAOO .by and.·.• lie···tw·:een·· Defendant Michael C~l~lill
·. ·
25 '
1 (''Call~"), ll,y hi~ ~tt91'Iley 'Qf ;re!.1Pt4, and Plaintiff EVERFLOW TECHNOLOGY
2'!} ' CORPORATION ("£v¢Iow"), bylil~;mtoi'Il¢Y .'Qf&ord, .that the Swond. Amend.e<!..Cotnplaint

21 · and. tlie abovt-<eaptionoo action.i& disnli$~ mt!I.,Pre)!.ldicec.a:~::dnstCalla~an b:fl:Werflow
~'8'·.•

I

.\i't:!IW!.I\'Tiol'{.O)?bi'Sli!!S$,4:'(; Ql())EiiE!;QA'Iif:llilcJL\;EL.CALLAGHANcBY'PLAll\'UFJ1
~~WT!ilOINOI.'!JiiY'OO'RMRATION

I
'

·CaseNo.icil7$7!1sBRL

I

1

pursuant to the tenns oftheir Settlement A,greement ami Mutua!Relel'!Se llltd FRCP 41 (a)(2).

2

SO StlJ.>uLATED.

3
4

Dated:J<tnuary 11.2013

B{/.YtJa
Richard La Fleur, Es<J ·
Attorney for Defendant
Mich<tel Callaghan

9

Attorney for Plaintiff
Everflow Technology Corpor<ttiiJ~

10

ll
12

13

14! I

151
16
L7
18

19
20

21

12
231
i•

.24[

25~

26 .
27

28

2
·~~'11!)!¥()F~I$$,!.1).()JIJ)"J!)Fill\!l!AmMlC:u.!JtLcA.LLAGJ:iANBYPLAINTIJ!F

JlYii;Rili.;!;!WTI©I:M:IJ;ol>Yt!fllil'ollA't!oJ<I Cas.,;No. dl7,eSi§sllRL.

1
[PROPOSED] ORDER

2

PURSUANT TO STlPtJLA.TJON,JT IS SO ORDERED.

3

I

4

j Dated:

5

January 28, 2013

HOWARD R. LLOYD
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

6
7

8
9
lO
II

12
13

141
15

16

u!

I

18!
19

Ij. Callil004- Evedlow\l:')eading$\Dismissal Stipulation nndl'roposed Orilet;dQc

20
21.

22.

231
24.1
20

1

26

21
3
.$Til''QLATipNJ(llj'l!)$l\'IJ~OFl)~J)WMf¢1i~I,CALtiGHANBYPLAINTIFi'

E'VJlR\lt9W!TEJ::Iil\'Qt;Q(;¥;~(llU'QRATioi'; DoseN!i.Co1cl!S79s'HRL